Over €2.6 million was spent in 2015 and 2016 combined on the pre-planning work for proposed Bus Rapid Transport (BRT) routes for Dublin, while work is planned to go ahead on cutdown versions of Dart Underground and Metro North projects.
The NTA said recently that they are reviewing if the BRT route to Swords will go ahead fully, or as just a bus lane upgrade or as BRT just within the M50 to serve areas which would not be served by Metro North.
But despite the unconfirmed status of the Swords BRT project over €2 million was spent on it between 2015 and 2016, in the year leading up to when cycling projects were put on hold due to lack of funding. This excludes any funding which went towards the project before or in 2014, when the three routes were announced in February of that year.
The last available plan for the Swords BRT route includes mixing walking and cycling, and mixing cycling with non-BRT buses — similar to the design of the Clontarf to City Centre Cycle Route, which is on the planned Clongrifin BRT route.
The planning drawings for the cycle route make no mention of BRT stops, but pre-planning versions of the drawings seen by IrishCycle.com highlight how separate space will be used for BRT and non-BRT buses.
The design practice of giving BRT buses separated space and higher priority means bicycles are mixed with conventional buses and people cycling are also mixed on shared footpaths. But it isn’t just an issue for cycling, experts in transport planning and buses have criticised the idea of giving greater priority to BRT buses rather than giving all buses high priority.
Meanwhile, despite population growth in line with or larger than predicted, cutdown versions of the Metro North and Dart Underground rail projects are still in pre-planning. The possible cuts include removing at least one underground station on both projects, and running the metro line above ground in Ballymun. Both projects will need new planning permission.
Figures from the National Transport Authority (NTA) show than less than €800,000 was spent on the two rail projects in the last two years, up to November 2016.
Below is the response from the NTA to a Freedom of Information request last year. The text in the images are from the NTA:
The amounts spent are for up to November 2016.
The NTA re-issued their reply on the issue of cycling funding cuts:
Hello Reader... IrishCycle.com is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.
There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for IrishCycle.com, it just needs enough people like you to believe!
Monthly subscriptions will give IrishCycle.com's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year IrishCycle.com had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.
I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.
The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!
But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via ko-fi.com/irishcycle/tiers