is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

“Safety concerns” cited for scrapping Limerick cycle lane plan but report points to loss of car parking

Limerick City and County Council said that “safety concerns for all road users” was the reason for scrapping a planned cycle lane for Davis Street in Limerick City — planning documents, however, only point to concerns over possible loss of parking and retaining two-way access for cars.

After public consultation the design for the street was change from a plan with wider footpaths with trees, a protected contra-flow cycle lane and narrow carriageway, to a design with a wide carriageway with bicycle symbols painted on the edge of it and narrower footpaths.

Two weeks ago the council’s twitter account sent the following statement in defence of the scheme: “Davis St design was altered following submissions from the public & elected representatives over safety concerns for all road users”.

We asked the council to point out exactly what the safety issue was for Davis Street, but they would only direct us to the Part 8 planning files and reports

The Part 8 planning report defends the plan for a contra-flow cycle lane and there is no mention in any of the documents of any “safety concerns” regarding it — there only seems to be mention of loss of car parking and a wish to retain two-way motorised access.

“Limerick Cycling Campaign is extremely disappointed that the city council has backtracked on its plans for improving Davis Street. We were supposed to be getting a real public realm improvement, consisting of a contra-flow cycle lane and wider footpaths and some trees. This would have helped the economic revitalisation of Davis Street and would have been an improvement for cycling access to the city,” said Alan McCormack, a spokesman for the Limerick Cycling Campaign.

“Instead, we have effectively got a very expensive resurfacing of the street. It seems that against best practice in urban design the City Council bowed to pressure from narrow local interests. We could have had a thriving and attractive city centre street with high footfall, safe for cyclists and pedestrians, but instead we will have the unappealing, unsafe, car-dominated status quo. Surely we have more ambition for our city than this? It’s a lose-lose for the city, for the street, for cyclists and even for those narrow interests themselves,” said McCormack.

He added: “The finished result also flys in the face of the Council’s own responses during the submissions process which highlighted the importance of including cycling infrastructure in their plans and reducing the use of cars.”

McCormack said: “Our fear now is that we will see a similar watering down of the plans for Parnell Street. It beggars belief that in Ireland’s ‘Smarter Travel Demonstrstion City’ that we are spending hundreds of thousands of taxpayer’s euros on public realm projects that don’t actually include smarter travel measures. Painting bicycle symbols onto tarmac doesn’t count.”

Cllr ‪DanielButler (FG) tweeted: “Changes made to excellent original plan during part 8 submission period by local interests. Disappointed with final result.”

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Tweeting about the planning files, An Taisce Limerick, said:”Looks like the Councillors signed off on the reversal of plans for Davis St. And it looks like Parnell St. suffered similar treatment.”

We are still waiting for a response from Limerick City and County Council in relation to the status of its  plan for Parnell Street element of the Part 8, which has yet to be constructed.

IMAGE: Davis Street as reconstructed is shown above, while the image below shows the streets and protected contra-flow cycle lane which was removed from the plan.

The Gardai welcomed the changes, including making Davis Street one-way. Only a few submissions seem to object to the plan for Davis Street. Here’s a summary of these from the planning file:

Planning drawings of the revised Davis Street design and the original plan: is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. This is still how it works in this country, we go through the motions of operating a modern progressive democracy until the old familiar hand of clientelism steps in and changes the actual outcome; in this case reasonably good plans go through the correct legal mechanisms for implementation only to be scuppered with no legal justification at the last minute because someone had a word in someones else’s ear.

    Compare this to the uproar earlier this week when Bus Eireann suggested that a lane of the M50 be given over to bus traffic. Not a chance in hell that was going to be allowed to happen no matter how good an idea it may or may not have been. Cyclists are not a sufficiently powerful or vociferous group to prevent their cause being repeatedly undermined by powerful lobbies on spurious grounds.

    My (admittedly under-informed) reading of the article is that there is no justification for the entirely inappropriate last minute changes and that there are very good grounds to launch significant objections, appeals and possibly even legal action. It should no longer be possible for this to happen. Ireland’s ‘Smarter Travel Demonstration City’. Ha, what a joke.


Leave a Reply to aka Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.