is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Liffey Cycle Route preferred route reveal delayed until 2019

— National Transport Authority fails to meet fifth deadline on core route.

The long-delayed reveal of the preferred option of the Liffey Cycle Route is delayed, again, at least until the new year.

The National Transport Authority has continued to fail to meet deadlines after it took the route planning away from Dublin City Council when councillors were on the verge of voting between two options.

The authority is also looking to revise its Greater Dublin Area Cycle Network before any significant sections of segregated routes are built.

The news comes as the Dublin Cycling Campaign tomorrow continues its monthly family-friendly Liffey Cycle protest starting at 11am from Grand Canal Square and traveling along the quays. The group also intends running a BusConnects workshop on the first four routes to be announced.

The National Transport Authority did not respond to a request for an update from before the weekend, but a spokesman told The Times that the Liffey route would be presented to Dublin City Council in the new year.

The authority has said the preferred route option would be revealed by December. Dermot O’Gara, a spokesman for the National Transport Authority said in October: “Work on the Liffey Cycle Scheme is at a very advanced stage and we hope to have it completed next month.”

In an article today, The Times covers criticism by Mikael Colville-Andersen of cycling progress in Dublin. Colville-Andersen recently left Copenhagenize, a cycling-focused planning agency he set up.

A spokesman for the National Transport Authority rejected Colville-Andersen‘s criticism of the Dodder Greenway staying it was “premature”.

However, Colville-Andersen‘s criticism of the Dodder has centred on mixing walking and cycling on shared paths and a large section of the route by South Dublin County Council is already confirmed as set to use shared paths, and the section closer to the city was recently put public consultation as a share paths.

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Influential local group Dodder Action, which does work on cleaning and protecting the river, views shared paths as the best solution for all users. The thinking goes against strong Irish and international advice and experience that mixing cycling and walking in urban areas does not work, especially not on routes between suburbs and large areas of employment.

According to The Times, Colville-Andersen also said that on-street cycle paths should never be bidirectional because he claimed they provided no protection from cars at busy junctions — although Colville-Andersen has made has opposition to two-way cycle paths known previously, the idea that such designs provided no protection at junctions will raise an eyebrow with our Dutch readers who are used to two-way cycle paths with signalised segregation.

Dutch cycle paths — both unidirectional and bidirectional — are widely viewed cycling observers to offer more protection at junctions.

Two-way cycle paths are still been built in the Netherlands in cities such as Amsterdam and Utrecht which have higher cycling modal share and are seen by other observers to have more children cycling themselves than Colville-Andersen‘s home city of Copenhagen. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

1 comment

  1. Honestly the protest is a joke at this point. I have been a few times and really what is the point of going at 11am on a SubSun. People use the cycle route during work hours. We should hold the protest at 5:30pm on a Friday if we want results


Leave a Reply to Tom Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.