IrishCycle.com is reader-funded journalism, but our subscription numbers have stalled at around 250 subscribers. 20 more subscribers by the end of August is the current target. Can you help? If you can, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Would transport in Ireland benefit from merging some of our transport agencies?

COMMENT & ANALYSIS: Do we need a DDOJSIOC to get everything in order with transport in Ireland?

This is reader-funded journalism, but it needs more support -- our target is 20 more subscribers by the end of August... can you help? Subscribe today.

DDOJSIOC stands for Deputy Director of Operations for Joint Systems Interdepartmental Operational Command. It’s actually a joke from Beverly Hills Cop 3.

But sometimes when you’re writing about transport and cycling in Ireland and mentioning the DoT, NTA, TII, DCC, FCC, DLRCC, SDCC, CCC, GCC, WI, OPW, IR, DB, BE, CIE, etc it feels like you might as well be saying DDOJSIOC.

You cannot merge everything, for examples: councils need some level of autonomy, but would transport in Ireland benefit from merging the Transport Infrastructure Ireland and the National Transport Authority?

Maybe at least parts of CIE too should be merged? CIE is the parent company of Dublin Bus, Irish Rail, Bus Éireann. I’m not talking about further privatisation. But it’s a reasonably strange situation to have a transport authority which doesn’t own bus, train stations or train lines.

Even if we set CIE aside for now… Merging the National Transport Authority and Transport Infrastructure Ireland seems to make sense given the overlapped in responsibilities.

Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII) is already is a merger of the National Roads Authority and the Railway Procurement Agency.

We’re left with the funny situation that TII was set up to cover the planning and overseeing operations for light rail, including Luas. Yet, technically the National Transport Authority (NTA) contracts this responsibility out to TII. Metro is another example where there’s an overlap, with the NTA being lead but TII holding the main engineering expertise for light rail project management.

Irish Rail also still holds a division covering at planning and construction of heavy rail routes.

And walking and cycling is yet another — currently the NTA covers guidelines for cities and town, and TII covers inter-urban routes and greenways (which is also partly cover by the Department of Transport, which is another story).

We also have a National Cycling Office in the NTA and we have new responsible being given to Regional Design Offices, which are a cooperation between councils and TII.

Having so many layers to transport also seems overly complicated when there’s just over 5 million people living in the Republic.

Some people, I know, would say go further and why not merge both TII and the NTA with the Department of Transport. That might be a step too far given the now long-established Governmental approach of buffering operations from different Government Ministers.

Maybe there’s something I’m missing here? At this point, with TII covering both roads and light rail, are there downside mixing the NTA (the main public transport) with TII (the main roads authority)? Is there a risk the merged body would be too focused on roads? Maybe all of these bodies would still go on existing just being fashioned as divisions of the new merged body? Maybe this is a distraction compare to the benefits it would give?

Hello Reader... IrishCycle.com is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for IrishCycle.com, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give IrishCycle.com's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year IrishCycle.com had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via ko-fi.com/irishcycle/tiers

Cian Ginty
Editor, IrishCycle.com

2 comments

  1. whilst it sounds complicated the issue is much older than that originally there were 2 offices the dublin transportation office and the department of transport .the DTO looked after dublin and the DOT looked after ireland now we have so many its crazy the NTA looks after taxis bikes public transport and some private transport . TII is roads and light rail DOT is still there for licencing of private operators and funding nta and tii .It was better when there were just 2 groups who had transport people employed now its mainly engineers and few people with a transport background which is important.

    Reply
  2. As Cllr. Dermot Lacey has often said there are too many agencies involved in delivering transport projects in the GDA, never mind the rest of the country.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Mike+McKillen Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.