is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Docklands Luas and cycling: Public inquiry report vs reality

Comment & Analysis: Interesting cycling nugget from the findings of the public inquiry for the Docklands Luas (extension C1) conducted for the Department of Transport:

“The project will involve the construction of a bridge linking Mayor Street Upper with Mayor Street Lower (Mayor Street Bridge) across Spencer Dock; this will provide a route for pedestrians and cyclists as well as LUAS vehicles; and it will also provide vehicle access to the National Conference Centre from Guild Street.

The bridge across Spencer Dock was not made cycling friendly and heading eastbound, once across the bridge there’s no legal way to proceed, no route. The road is blocked as shown in this image and this artificial blocking in one direction (there’s loads of space!) is followed by no route past the Luas stop in both directions (in the far background, along the tracks):

Image: Google Street View

The inquiry findings go on to say that:

“It will also be necessary to close the road linking Mayor Street Lower with Amiens Street except for LUAS vehicles, cyclists and pedestrians.”

Was that link kept for cyclists? No, it was not. No entry, tram only signs face anybody trying to make that link. But it gets worse. Heading past that missing link and to Habourmaster Place — which is still an access road to Connolly Station and a ton of apartments — you are faced with (non-legal) signs trying to claim cyclists have to dismount.

A cycling banned sign painted on the road and a “cyclists dismount” sign on a pole, note that this section is open to all traffic and there is no legal means to ban cyclists here:

This image below was taken just past the above image; note the no entry, expect trams signs to the left in the background (which the public inquiry for the tram line said should remain open to cyclists); and again note that this road is open to all traffic and there is no legal means to ban cyclists here — the right turn here is to Habourmaster Place, Connolly Station and a ton of apartments:

With a little extra cost and time all of this could have been designed cycling friendly: But why wasn’t it? Within the report, the RPA shows how little it knows about cycling. Responding to public input, the RPA said:

“Insufficient road space is available to submission to Inquiry. – Cycling issues. accommodate a dedicated cycleway. RPA believe that there is now a greater awareness of the risk to cyclists since the introduction of LUAS in 2004. An alternative cycle route, of very high quality, has been provided by DDDA in the Campshires.”

The campshires route they mention are the lanes at footpath level along the quays in the Docklands, if the RPA honestly thought these were “of very high quality”, it just shows how disconnected they were from the reality of cycling.

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Are the RPA ready to make the same mistakes again with the Luas BXD (the line planned from St Stephen’s Green to Broadstone via the city centre and Grangegorman)? From their plans, it looks like it. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. Fair lay lads, keep up the good work, it’s only through constant reminders will the powers that be stop the lazy disjointed nonsense.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.