is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Cycle lane guidelines only adopted after major Dublin repairs

In the gutter: Lane widths across much of Dublin’s cycle lane network are now below guidelines set out in the National Cycle Manual, which says broken-lined cycle lanes used around much of Dublin City should “only to be used in exception circumstances.”

Design guidelines costing nearly €250,000 and aimed at making roads safer for cyclists were set aside on a technicality for resurfacing works to 24km of roads in Dublin.

Officials from the National Transport Authority (NTA) defended the disregarding of their own guidelines, the National Cycle Manual, while cycling campaigners called it “an appalling sign for the future.”

The manual was published at early last year and was available to road authorities before this, but the NTA said the resurfacing — which cost €22 million — did not have to follow the manual because the “work predated the formal adoption” of the manual.

The document, which has taken seven years to complete, sets out detailed guidelines on making streets safer and more attractive to cyclists.

Mike McKillen, spokesman for Dublin Cycling Campaign, said: “If the manual represents best practice, whether it’s legally in force or not, they should have adopted best practice.”
“The city had €18 million to do the road resurfacing, that’s a huge amount of money and not to get cycling right… it’s an appalling sign for the future.”

A spokeswoman for the NTA said: “In relation to the Dublin City re-surfacing project, the design, tendering and carrying out of this work predated the formal adoption of the NTA Cycle Design Manual.”

She said the board of the NTA agreed to formally adopt the manual on December 9, under powers in the Dublin Transport Authority Act 2008. It means local authorities in the Greater Dublin Area must, under law, now have regard for the manual.

The NTA said with projects it is funding outside the Dublin area, it will link the manual to funding, and has “suggested” the Department of Transport does the same.

Asked why following manual was not a funding requirement for the repaving works when nearly €20 million of the funding came from the NTA, the authority repeated that the manual had not been formally adopted.

The National Cycle Policy says “it is clear that the cycling infrastructure that has been constructed to date is often of a poor standard and is poorly maintained”, the design manual is supposed to address these problems and “reflect best international practice and the latest thinking.”

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Most of the so-called Dublin “cycling network”, which includes cycle and bus lanes, is now substandard compared to the designs in the manual. Minimum standards were ignored with the recent resurfacing undertaken late last year and into the new year.

Dublin City Council said the works followed the “first principles” of the manual. A spokesman said: “The first principles of the document have been followed, by eliminating defects in the road surface, there is improved safety for cyclists.”

“The cycle network in Dublin has evolved in line with the legislation that was in force at the time of construction. The NTA Cycle Manual was not adopted until after completion of the resurfacing project. The project re-instated the existing road markings.”

This article was originally published in the print edition of Cycling in Dublin in June 2012. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

1 comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.