Contra-flow cycle lanes are far from new to Dublin, but is it time for the city to provide more of these cycling short-cuts? Cian Ginty reports.
Even when driving, one-way streets can be very frustrating, but most drivers don’t realise just how much Dublin’s network of one-way streets is designed for the car.
“One way streets are not something we’re into doing anymore. They tend to work from a car point of view because they generate capacity and longer links for stacking [traffic], but from a cyclist’s or
Dublin’s one-way system is extensive in the city centre area inside the canals – see the map left, showing just the multi-laned one-way streets. It’s nearly the flip opposite of the Dutch model.pedestrian’s point of view they are not great,” says Eoghan Madden, a senior engineer at Dublin City Council.
Our roads were made one-way for capacity to the benefit of motorists and at a cost to everybody else – cyclists who have to live with detours, bus users who have disconnected in and outbound bus stops, and the people living on and round what amount to very urban sections of dual carriageways.
Cycling friendly Dutch cities design central areas much differently. Cyclists get direct routes. City centres are designed on the principle that cars are pushed away from the centre and the one-way systems generally only apply to motorised traffic.
In a way, the system of using the extra capacity is nearly ingenious in allowing the city to hold more cars than it should be able to. But it fails because Dublin is too often so close to capacity for cars that it leads to too much unpredictability when a little extra traffic or an event can cause gridlock for half the city centre.
If you live, work or study on or near a one-way street, it could mean a long detour or, like in many cases in Dublin, it means being forced to cross many lanes of sometimes fast moving traffic.
Other European cities such as Brussels, Paris, Berlin and to a lesser extent London have been progressive on the issue while Dublin has stalled. The latest edition of a report on cycling conditions in Dublin, published every five years, says there has been little or no progress on one-way streets and major junctions.
The city council had outlined a plan to allow cyclists two-way access to Westmoreland Street, D’Olier Street, Moss Street, Leinster Street South, Nassau Street, the Clarendon Street area, St Stephen’s Green, Baggot Street Lower, Merrion Row, Leeson Street Upper, Camden Street, Parnell Street, Steven’s Lane, and Watling Street. But nothing has happened since.
Eoghan Madden says “it’s not off the agenda but it kind of went slow” because of planning for Metro North and Luas, but he says there should be a priority attached to implementing contra-flow lanes.
“It is something that we should attach a priority to just plainly because it is perfectly obvious,” says Madden.
You're read this much of the article... if you value our journalism, please subscribe today.
“It’s not obvious unless you’re on a bike but becomes perfectly obvious once you are on Parnell Square and you go up the hill only to come down the other side again.”
Traffic and transport officials in Dublin have mixed opinions. Michael Aherne from the National Transport Authority is supportive at looking at the issue but seems less convinced.
“Contra-flow cycling is something we are looking at with the city council,” says Aherne. “The first question is do we still need the one-way street, do we actually need the one-way system?”
But when it comes to contra-flow on narrow streets without separation, he says: “We just were not ready to go there” when designing the authority’s cycle manual, and he says: “It could be a peripheral… We do have to get our priorities right.”
Andrew Montague, the outgoing lord mayor and Labour councillor, says the law needs to be changed. “On narrow one-way streets in Belgium and France the research shows that making them two-way for cyclists makes them safer for cyclists. I’d like to see on narrow, one-lane one-way streets that it would be legal for cyclists to go both ways. But that’s not a decision for the council, it’s a decision for government – we lobbied for it in the past and we’re lobbying for it again,” he says.
Montague adds: “The results elsewhere show it’s safe and I’d like to see it implemented here.” But you don’t have to look elsewhere. There’s at least two examples of this type of contra flow working for cyclists right here in Dublin – one in Phibsborough and the other in Terenure. These are not trials, but examples which have already stood the test of time and are now more than a few years old. These examples are backed by legal measures – it’s under the provisions where local authorities can make a street or one side of a street no-entry except, for example, buses, cyclists, or motorcyclists.
Meanwhile, Parnell Street eastbound stands as a classical example of a long detour around the one-way systems just to progress a short distance, just 100m in this case. Cyclists are sent uphill on more than a half a kilometre detour around the wide, multi-lane one-way system on Parnell Square. For cyclists it disrupts east-west flow as well as access to O’Connell Street.
Because of the Luas and Henry Street, which is pedestrianised, there is no east-west alternative south of this point for over a kilometre and, even then, the quays is that alternative which is seen as one of the most hostile place for cyclists in the city centre.
Here and elsewhere in the city centre the council has assigned the blame to the Railway Procurement Agency which had been planning Metro North and still is planning the cross-city Luas BXD line. Montague says: “We kept running into the same problem — ‘Luas is coming, leave it for the moment’ we were told.”
When asked about the contra-flow lanes far away from the planned Luas or stalled Metro, he says the lanes were harder to design than had been expected. “The other thing is they are hard to design. We thought we’d pick up the low hanging fruit but none of them are easy. They were much more difficult to implement than expected so there has not been much progress to it,” says Montague.
He also rejects the idea that there was political backlash against providing contra-flow for cyclists. “I don’t remember any political backlash.” Even if there was, he says: “There’s 52 councillors so if two councillors are against it I’m sure a majority would support it.”
Mike McKillen, spokesman for the Dublin Cycling Campaign, says: “I don’t think they fully accept that they have to deconstruct one-way streets particularly the multi-laned ones.”
“Look at the example of D’Olier and Westmorland Streets – they’ve known and talked about doing something about it for the past four or five years. I don’t there’s any willingness so far – there’s talk about it, but just get on with it,” he says.
He adds: “I think they are terrified to do anything which might have a knock-on affect on the quays.”
Another major problem with talking about changing one-way streets is that some people see it as contentiously providing for lawbreakers, rather than seeing it as providing for everybody including children and cyclists carrying children who prefer to avoid dual-carriageway like conditions.
Allowing cyclists to avoid such unfriendly conditions was exactly what Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council was doing when it recently provided a segregated contra-flow only cycle path between Blackrock Village and Dun Laoghaire (pictured in the main image at the top of this page).
The Sunday Independent however billed it as “Cyclists who illegally went the wrong way up a suburban road have got their own way – at a cost of €150,000 to the taxpayer.”
The paper highlighted the mention by the council of the “high numbers of cyclists currently cycling illegally along” the road. This however was a footnote in the council’s consultation report, which mainly highlighted how the lane was part of a route serving Booterstown, Blackrock, Monkstown, Dun Laoghaire and Dalkey and how there is a catchment of thousands of school children, students, workers and residents within just 500m of the route.
The stark cost also included a bus stop upgrade and as much new footpath as new cycle path.
“I think all the difficulties were before the work and the consultation and before getting agreement,” says Conor Geraghty, an assistant engineer with Dun Laoghaire Rathdown County Council.
“But once it was put in it has been very well received – the gardai are very happy with it. Consultation is always a big part of the process.”
The consultation report for the project also includes some interesting comments from a resident who had at first objected. He wrote: “Thanks for that reassurance, seems one of our local councillors went off half cocked and misinformed us as to the detail.”
Some of the older designs could be better – and the city is in the process of fixing a number of these – but overall contra-flow seems to work in making cycling that bit more attractive.and misinformed us as to the detail.”
This article was originally published in the print edition of Cycling in Dublin in June 2012.
Below is a video from Dutch cycling blog A View from the Cycle Path showing how one-way streets can be designed for cyclists:
Map of the current contra-flow streets and lanes in Dublin:
View Contra-flow cycle Dublin in a larger map
MORE: Cycle lane guidelines only adopted after major Dublin repairs
MORE: “We have to do” quays cycle route – senior Dublin engineer
MORE: “Little or no progress” with Dublin’s complex junctions or major one-way streets says report on cycling