It’s been rightly pointed out that our story on the Royal Canal Greenway only included one of many issues, another issue is the gradients of ramps at road crossing and canal locks.
There’s two great blogs showing how the Dutch do things — bicycledutch.wordpress.com and aviewfromthecyclepath.com but sometimes the comments are even more insightful… Like one comment by Herbert Tiemens who is a traffic engineer based in Utrecht in the Netherlands. He said:
“The Dutch recommendations (CROW 230) say a ramp for cyclists shouldn’t have more than 5%. When the vertical climb is very short, a higher grade can be used. When the total vertical slope is more than 4 meters, a maximum of 4% is recommended. Also the horizontal parts are suggested, they should be at least 25m horizontal. As a cyclist with a good condition I don’t like the horizontal parts on a longer slope that much, it gets you out your rhythm. But for less powerful people the horizontal platforms are ok.”
A large planned ramp between Castleknock and the M50 on the Royal Canal Greenway is proposed to be 1 in 12 or 8.333%, 48 meters long, and — according to the planning drawings — have four flat rest areas (the horizontal parts referred to by Tiemens above).
Therefore the planned ramp is over twice the maximum recommended gradient CROW, by the Dutch design manual.
If the drawings are correct and there is going to be four horizontal sections, than to reach the minimum recommend length by CROW the horizontal would be longer than the planned ramp!
We’re not saying it’s realistic to expect Dutch standards, but is it acceptable to be so far from the minimums and maximums outlined in their manual?
The gradients for other ramps are not shown – although these are shorter ramps than the one mention above.
Another issue is gates or barriers. The planning drawing says a cycle friendly arrangement will be put in place — will this force cyclists to stop or dismount? Will cargo bikes, cargo trikes, and child trailers fit?
Public consultation closes at 5pm today.
Subscription drive update: IrishCycle.com reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).
If you can help push IrishCycle.com above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!
Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.
IrishCycle.com is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.
There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for IrishCycle.com, it just needs enough people like you to believe!
Monthly subscriptions will give IrishCycle.com's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year IrishCycle.com had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.
I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.
The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!
But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via ko-fi.com/irishcycle/tiers