is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Councillors’ calls to tackle rat runs fall on deaf ears

Arnott Street
Arnott Street

Dublin City Council officials told councillors on Monday that the primary reason traffic calming measures are being ruled out for a residential street is because the 50km/h speed limit is not being exceeded on the short and narrow street (pictured, right).

Although the road and traffic department said it would re-examine the situation on Arnott Street in Portobello because of the large petition from residents, councillors complained that the issue was going on for too long.

Cllr Maria Parodi said there are a lot of young children living in the area and the situation is getting worse.

It was put by Cllr Mannix Flynn that if the inaction was the way the city was to handle traffic the city is “doomed” and “handing over the city to speeding cars”.

Cllr Kieran Binchy highlighted the refusal of traffic calming at the entrance to Saint Matthew’s School in Dublin 4 and St Kevin’s Road in Portobello.

St Kevin's Road
St Kevin’s Road

The school is looking for a ‘school ahead’ sign and traffic calming. He said that if parents and teachers are telling them that there’s a problem in front of a school it should be looked at again.

He said the issue of St Kevin’s Road which is being used as a rat run is very similar to Arnott Street. He said about five councillors have requested traffic calming but it has again being refused. Binchy said: “Rat running is going on and it’s an area with parents of young children who would like to be able to know that their children are safe on the street which they live. And yet again we are being refused.”

“What I was told was that the legal position is that it’s the management’s power, so it’s also the management’s problem to resolve. It’s completely ridiculous that we’re being told that councillors have no power and that you [council officials] are the ones with the power and yet you are not exercising that power,” Binchy said.

Cllr Dermot Lacey said residents have been “let down by the council”. He said that he accepts that the rules around placing calming measures might be made by others but that “there is a distinction between the engineering answers you have based on a whole load rules laid down by other people, and the real practical solutions which can be addressed when there’s a bit of local knowledge”. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. ‘traffic calming measures are being ruled out for a residential street is because the 50km/h speed limit is not being exceeded’……that can’t be right? It is done ALL over the country. Either someone has been misquoted or they had some kind of brain explosion.

  2. Unbelievable. This is very basic stuff. All engineers should know that the speed limit does not automatically align with the appropriate speeds at which vehicles should be travelling, especially on local residential streets. At least they agreed to review the speed limit. This will however need to be supported with design measures. To keep speeds low on long straights carefully placed raised tables (not ramps) are a must.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.