is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Dublin City Council continues to put cyclists on footpaths

Bicycle symbols to be painted onto the footpath surface.

Despite Dublin City councillors highlighting cyclists on footpaths as an issue for many residents, the city is planning to mix cyclists and pedestrians at a busy roundabout on the South Circular Road.

The councillors say they are often contacted by residents — especially older ones — about the issue.

Councillors often complain at council meetings that the city does not do enough to stop cyclists from using footpaths. In response, officials claim the issue is purely an enforcement problem which is out of their hands, but Dublin City Council council is increasingly using designs which mix cyclists and pedestrians.

The latest design is on the South Circular Road and is part of the Rialto Area Improvement Scheme, which is already under construction.

Pensioners visiting the local post office will swap the old roundabout with no pedestrian crossings for the new roundabout where they have to watch out for cyclists legally on the footpath outside shops.

The Draft Dublin City Public Realm Strategy promises to prioritise pedestrian, cyclists and public transport within the canals. But cyclists who follow the directions of city council to use the footpath in Rialto will likely find them self losing priority at every point and cyclists are requested to yield at the pedestrian / cyclist crossing points when motorists are not.

On the subject of mixing cyclists and pedestrians, the National Cycle Manual says: “Shared facilities are disliked by both pedestrians and cyclists and result in reduced Quality of Service for both modes. With the exception of purpose-designed shared streets, shared facilities should be avoided in urban areas as far as possible”

The project also includes about 160 meters of cycle lanes in both direction in South Circular Road, however the buffer between the cycle lane and parking on the side of the road is smaller than the minimum in the National Cycle Manual and half the size of the recommended 1 meter buffer.

Some cyclists will choose to not follow the council’s guidance to use the footpath or cycle lanes — as they are legally allowed to  — and many others will question why are cyclists being encouraged onto footpaths when there are plans to soon fine people for cycling on footpaths.

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

County wide, over 60% of Dublin politicians surveyed earlier this year said that shared use footpaths were not an inviting place for old or blind people, while 50% said that the design sends mixed messages to cyclists who are usually told not to cycle on footpaths.

MORE: Rialto Area Improvement Scheme (on
MORE: Stop Footpath Cycling is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

1 comment

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.