No paywall and let's keep it that way. Support reader-funded journalism, subscribe today.

Increase in cycling deaths bad news, but focusing on behaviour alone is a disservice

A member of the Garda Traffic Corps, the Irish traffic police, at work

Eight people have now lost their life while cycling in Ireland so-far this year. This is up three deaths from last year. However, as we reported in January, 2013 was a joint low year for deaths of people cycling.

The increase has led The Irish Times to speculate that: “The death toll, just over half way through the year, puts us on course to have the worst year for cyclist fatalities since 2008 when 13 died on the roads.”

If, however, you look at the deaths by month last year, it’s still not inconceivable that there would be no deaths between now and the end of the year. It would be only one less death than the same period last year, when the deaths were front-loaded into the first half of the year.

Dutch cycle path
Dutch segregation at a junction which keeps bicycles and tricks separate

These are after all not accidents. These are avoidable collisions. Better behaviour from all road users is part of the solution but it should not be sold as the only part.

Irish Times journalist Genevieve Carbery writes: “With a growing number of cyclists on the road, how do we keep fatalities from increasing too? Some room for improvement appears to lie in more care and attention, and education of drivers and cyclists.”

Let’s not forget following best international practice and improving road design. A key part of this is giving bicycle users segregated cycle routes on busy roads with heavy or fast-moving traffic — such as the route planned for Dublin’s quays which has still only been covered negatively by The Irish Times.

The Road Safety Authority says it’s all fine, we just have to share the road. The RSA have a blindspot of their own and continue to claim that road conditions have little affect on deaths while also pointing out how safe motorways are. The international evidence shows that cycling-friendly design can and does protect people who cycle.

An editorial, also published yesterday in The Irish Times, says: “Some urban based cyclists might take false comfort from the fact that the incident occurred on a national primary route. But eight days later – as the Dublin Coroner’s court heard on Wednesday – cyclist Louise Butler (26) died after a left-turning heavy goods vehicle (HGV) collided with her in suburban Blackrock.”

Louise Butler was killed on a  national primary route. One of the few remaining national roads within the M50 after most were detrunked.

Why does this matter? The design of this road — like many others — is not some kind of cultural issue — it’s a design and engineering one linked to political choices. The national road status of the road in Blackrock likely helped the council think that when drawing up a redesign of the road, it was ok to retain elements “exposing pedestrians and cyclists to greater danger”.

A segregated cycle path on a roundabout in the suburbs of Amsterdam

The voice of The Irish Times continues: “Arguably, there is no road user more vulnerable than a cyclist due to proximity to cars, buses and HGVs.” But this can only be argued if you somehow could say that motorcyclists outnumber those on bicycles, or that significant numbers of pedestrians are not killed when crossing the road.

The editorial covers how HGV blind spot mirrors being a positive thing but that in “Louise Butler’s case, the HGV had some blind spots although it was fitted with all mandatory mirrors.”  The Dutch still have the same issue — people on bicycles continue to be killed by trucks where junctions have not been upgraded.

It’s not magic. Cycling is not in the Dutch DNA. It’s design. Putting cyclists ahead of traffic using Dutch-style segregation and giving users of these paths a separate traffic light phase or a headstart with advance bicycle traffic lights, works.

The Irish Times cannot with a straight-face cover the planned Dublin quays project with such negativity and then, just weeks later, act concerned about protecting the type of road users the project would protect.

As one of our readers recently commented: “These papers were reporting that for the first time ever there is a chance that parents will out live their children due to obesity, they went on an offensive against a plan which may have immediate beneficial effects on peoples health.”

But it’s worse than not being able to join up the dots. As we have covered in detail, The Irish Times has undermined the case for the quays route project by undermining and downplaying the roll cycling has in the city.  The — wilful or not — distorted data used in the coverage by the Times mirrors tactics used against the project by high-end retail Brown Thomas. Incorrect data, no context, and misleading and incorrect context on cycling and the quays route remains unchanged on Irish Times articles online.

The increase in cycling deaths clearly is bad news, but the solutions are not limited to behaviour changing. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

September subscription drive update: has reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October), but this is unlikely and so the new target is the end of the year.

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

1 comment

  1. The RSA continually focuses on cyclists presumed responsibilty for their demise in these collisions. It is blaming the victim which is easy.
    The fundamental question that the RSA and DoTTAS have to answer is why uniquely in Ireland do we permit semi-trailers to operate in congested areas in a totally unfettered way – with the exception of Dublin City where some attempt is made to control access to the city under permit. However I regularly detect HGVs that have no permit to be there and this shows that An Garda is not doing enough intercepts on the streets of Dublin to check for permits.
    The manufacturers of these vehicles well know that they are not designed for other than inter-urban shifting of goods on motorways/dual-ways and going to depots on the outskirts of major towns and cities where loads will be broken down for urban distribution using smaller goods vehicles.
    Ireland is unique in that it no longer transports goods by rail. All goods are transported internally by road.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.