IrishCycle.com is reader-funded journalism, but our subscription numbers have stalled at around 250 subscribers. 20 more subscribers by the end of August is the current target. Can you help? If you can, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Dodder greenway should be a “bicycle superhighway” says Danish experts

River Dodder greenway
A current section of the Dodder Greenway

Danish consultants who worked on plans for the River Dodder Greenway in Dublin say that people cycling and walking along the river should be kept apart, and the route should become a “bicycle superhighway”.

This is reader-funded journalism, but it needs more support -- our target is 20 more subscribers by the end of August... can you help? Subscribe today.

The suggestion of keeping people cycling and walking segregated could be a popular one with those on two-wheels as well as walkers, joggers and dog walkers who use current paths along the Dodder.

It follows the news that the Tallaght to Dublin Docklands greenway is step closer to reality as the councils involved are seeking a project management team.

Copenhagenize Design Company (formally Copenhagenize Consulting) is based in Copenhagen and works on cycling projects across the world. The head of the company, Mikael Colville-Andersen, said that they were “not thrilled” with the results of a feasibility study for the mostly urban greenway.

Along with project leaders, Roughan & O’Donovan and AECOM, and Cunnane Stratton Reynolds, the Copenhagenize Design Company worked on the feasibility study report on the route. The aim of which is “developing a high quality walking and cycling route along the River Dodder”.

A greenway in Copenhagen with footpath and two-way cycle path separated by a stone drainage channel
A greenway in Copenhagen with footpath and two-way cycle path separated by a stone drainage channel

“Our recommendation was clear,” said Mikael Colville-Andersen, CEO of Copenhagenize Design Company, “Make it a bicycle superhighway for commuters, building bridges at several relevant locations.”

He said his company had suggetsed an international competition “for young architects to design all the bridges”.

Colville-Andersen added: “Provide space for walking, sure, but prioritise the bicycle superhighway. We do not advocate shared use paths except in recreational areas, and even then clearly separated by markings.”

The study was funded by the National Transport Authority, while the route crosses the boundries of three council areas — Dublin City Council, Dn Laoghaire–Rathdown County Council and South Dublin County Council.

Like the Netherlands, in urban areas in Copenhagen people cycling and walking are kept apart as standard — the mixing of cycling and walking is rare. The report for the Dodder seem to mainly recommend a 4 meter wide which will be shared use between walking and cycling — even where there are no apparent structural or environmental pinch points.

“We were involved in the start up of the project and went for a long ride along the route with the whole team,” Colville-Andersen said. “We did the peer review of the project and you’re right, we were not thrilled to see what they came up with. There was so much potential for world class infrastructure along the Dodder, but the final report landed far from the mark.”

According to the 2011 Census, the areas around the route inside the M50 have a relatively high cycling modal share.  The ‘electoral divisions’ Census areas generally have a cycling modal share of between 9-15% — with pockets of smaller area reaching as high as 19%. These figures have likely increased in line with traffic counts in the last few years.

Hello Reader... IrishCycle.com is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for IrishCycle.com, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give IrishCycle.com's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year IrishCycle.com had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via ko-fi.com/irishcycle/tiers

Cian Ginty
Editor, IrishCycle.com

12 comments

  1. Any person in Dublin and Ireland who Cycles daily could have told them that shared use paths do not work,we do not need Consultants to tell us that. The Councils are fiddling around again trying to get away with shoddy infrastructure instead of doing things right. These so called Irish designers and Road Builders need to get out on Bikes before they decide to do anything.

    Reply
  2. I cycle the existing Dodder River bridleway between Donnybrook and Ballsbridge and it is not suitable for shared-space as it stands. There are no pavement markings or signage to indicate shared-use in any event so pedestrians wander all over it with dogs on long retractable leads too, which are a safety menace.
    When I walk the path cyclists come up behind me without ringing a bell to warn me. Come to think about the majority don’t have a bell, which is illegal!
    I met Mikael during his study visit and he is absolutely right about his advice being ignored. What’s new in Irish road/traffic implementation!
    But one needs to look behind what constraints (funding, windscreen-view of traffic, etc) that may be imposed on designers and advisers by City/county managers and paymasters.
    The key question is: Who is dictating that we get rubbish every time?

    Reply
  3. @Bob S., thanks but I went through the whole registration process and then it still said ‘documents available after expressions of interest’, so I think one has to be a legitimate company to access them via that site.

    Reply
  4. Not going to work or even be fit for purpose if it’s shared use.a total waste of money and time. What the point of paying for advice from NL or DK and ignoring it ? The councils are not taking cycling seriously as a mode f transport. If this happens, the flawed trend will only continue. People don’t want this, even if they don’t know it right now. Even North America is doing better than this in many instances. They people who have the expertise and the end users are bring bypassed. Who’s pulling the strings here ? Lobbies ?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.