IrishCycle.com is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Top Irish greenway proposals lost out to flawed ones in pre-election funding

Greenways highly recommended by a panel of cycling and tourism experts lost out on funding to politically-selected routes, including one which had “not enough emphasis on quality” and another in the then junior transport minister’s constituency.

The Sunday Business Post reported yesterday that the expert panel was largely ignored when it came to selecting 38 greenway projects.

Top ten greenways selected by an independent panel

South Kerry greenway – funded
Galway to Moycullen greenway – funded
Monasteries of the Moy greenway (Ballina-Killala) – only partly funded
Cork Harbour greenway – not funded
Broadmeadow way greenway (Malahide and Donabate) – not funded
Blessington greenway in Wicklow – not funded
Sligo greenway – not funded
Clifden to Letterfrack greenway in Galway – not funded
River Barrow greenway in Carlow – not funded

Joe O’Brien, a Green Party general election candidate for Dublin Fingal, said: “The decision by Minister Kelly to refuse funding to six of the ten greenway projects pinpointed by experts as best for funding requires urgent and detailed explanation in the Dáil. There is a real concern that public money has been grossly abused for crass electoral purposes. We were promised a democratic revolution by this Government, but it is clear that cronyism is alive and well when it comes to funding for local projects. Minister Kelly must answer these serious allegations without delay, lest he be held in the same contempt as James Reilly following his questionable allocation of funding to primary care centres in his own constituency.”

He added: “The decision not to allocate money to the Broadmeadow section of the Fingal coastal greenway between Malahide and Donabate will mean that what could and should have been the jewel in Fingal’s tourism crown will now not happen. I have been in contact with my colleague Cllr. David Healy, and it’s clear this decision will be a blow to local communities in Donabate and Malahide in particular. The Fingal coastal greenway could have run from Balbriggan to Sutton and has huge economic, employment, transport, social and health benefits that have now all been scuppered by Minister Kelly.”

COMMENT: Panel wrong on Galway-Dublin greenway funding, but political approach generally flawed

The pre-election cycling funding of €4 million which went to the Athlone to Mullingar greenway, against the priority list of an expert panel, could possibly be explained by the viewpoint that it makes up part of the Galway-Dublin cycle route, a top priority at policy level which even the then minister for transport had highlighted a number of times as a priority.

But relatively marginal bits of funding being spread across the country against the expert panel’s advice smacks of trying to buy votes, however unsuccessful. When one of the largest amounts — €1.9 million — went to the then junior transport minister’s constituency, questions have to be asked.


You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.


The problem is amplified by overall low levels of funding spread around too much. A million euro here and half a million there may sound like a lot but for long lengths of high quality greenways, it’s not. Add in the cost of bridges etc and the money quickly goes. The expert panel warned not to fund some projects because of a lack of detail or quality. It was wrong to not follow that advice.

If we want truly world class greenways the Government has a choice to increase overall funding or limit the funding to a smaller number of projects. The try to keep everybody happy option is not the kind of politics which the Government promised.

IrishCycle.com is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: IrishCycle.com reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push IrishCycle.com above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

***

IrishCycle.com is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for IrishCycle.com, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give IrishCycle.com's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year IrishCycle.com had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via ko-fi.com/irishcycle/tiers

Cian Ginty
Editor, IrishCycle.com

1 comment

  1. Arrogant self-serving cretin.

    What percentage of the transport budget is spent on cycling infrastructure? The last time I checked, it wasn’t broken down in a way that you could tell (cycling/walking/smarter travel all lumped together). Was anyone in government ever serious about reaching a 10% national cycling modal share?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.