is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Dodder Greenway: Docklands to Miltown section to be designed by next August

— Council claims route to “aspire to be on a par with the best in Europe” despite Danish experts highlighting flawed approach

Designs for the Dodder Greenway between the Docklands and Miltown are expected to be ready by August 2015.

In a memo to Dublin City councillors, the transport section of the council said that a tender is soon to be issued to hire an engineering consultant firm to design the section which covers the Dublin City and Dun Laoghaire Rathdown areas of the route. Another design team is to work on the South Dublin County Council section of the route.

Christopher Manzira, a senior executive engineer at Dublin City Council wrote in the memo: “The Environment and Transportation Department of Dublin City Council will be inviting tenders for the engineering design of the Dodder Greenway within the Dublin City and Dun Laoghaire Rathdown administrative areas. It is anticipated that the Invitation to Tender will be sent out on 18th December 2014. This will facilitate commencement of the design process by end February 2015.”

(article continues below map)

City section of Dodder Greenway
MAP: Docklands to Miltown section, with possible links to nearly focal points

He said: “The schedule of activities will require the engineering consultant to start the statutory planning process within six months of appointment. It is anticipated therefore that plans for the scheme will be available from August 2015.”

Manzira said that the route should “aspire to be on a par with the best in Europe and should include ancillary features for tourists and amenity users”, however Danish consultants hired by the National Transport Authority disagree with the current planned approach of largely mixing walking and cycling on the route.

In September, we reported how the head of the Copenhagenize Design Company said that the route should be a “bicycle superhighway”, with footpath and cycle path segregated for each other.

“Our recommendation was clear,” said Mikael Colville-Andersen, CEO of Copenhagenize Design Company, “Make it a bicycle superhighway for commuters… We do not advocate shared use paths except in recreational areas, and even then clearly separated by markings.”

Those comments were made to after the Dodder Feasibility Study Report was released as part of the environmental and ecological assessment tender.

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

The council memo this week said that the overall project requires a single environmental and ecological assessment and that the consultant firm has been appointed to carry out an assessment on behalf of the three local authorities — Dublin City, Dun Laoghaire Rathdown, and South Dublin. Two engineering consultancy teams are to be appointed to carry out the design of the schemes, including the statutory planning process.

MORE: is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. I seem to remember seeing seven different environmental approval processes listed that have to be cleared before work can begin. Any bets on when it will start on site or more importantly when it will be fully completed?

  2. If this route is intended to be used by commuting cyclists, or indeed for anything other than just recreation, shared use is absolutely *not suitable*. There will be many users, with differing needs, going different directions and by different modes. The route links many residential and employment areas as well as recreational ones. If it goes ahead as shared use now, it will need to be redesigned at some point in the future, at great expense.

    “Cyclists are still likely to be regarded as a problem because their behaviour is different to that of pedestrians. Cyclists appear to invade personal space around pedestrians, to “squeeze past”, to wobble and to swerve in and out. Even when taking care, their behaviour seems aggressive and unpredictable to many pedestrians. Complaints about excessive speed of cyclists on shared paths are often a result of perception by pedestrians rather than being due to cyclists riding past pedestrians at genuinely high speeds.
    …What’s really required to encourage people to cycle: cycling must be fast. It is important that cycling journeys are made efficient and safe as otherwise cycling does not compete with other modes of transport.”


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.