IrishCycle.com is reader-funded journalism, but our subscription numbers have stalled at around 250 subscribers. 20 more subscribers by the end of August is the current target. Can you help? If you can, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Fines for cycling offenses do not target causes of issues says Cllr Cuffe

— Cycling group says magnitude of the fine should reflect relative difference in mass and velocity
— Green/FF government were first ones to propose such fines

This is reader-funded journalism, but it needs more support -- our target is 20 more subscribers by the end of August... can you help? Subscribe today.

A plan by the Government for on-the-spot fines of around €50 for cycling offenses is the wrong way to tackle bad behavior, Cllr Ciarán Cuffe (Green) said yesterday.

Cuffe said there should be a plan to target the “causes of these problems in the first place”, however the on-the-spot fines were promised in the National Cycle Policy which was first introduced as Green/FF policy.

Red light jumping and cycling on footpaths are expected to some of the first targeted offences.

There are mixed feeling among people who cycle about the planned fines — with many people who cycle saying on social media that they support the idea of fines. As we reported in October, the Government’s Road Safety Strategy promised that the fines would be in place by “Q2 2014” — so their introduction is already 6 months late and counting.

At the moment, when a person on a bicycle is caught breaking a red traffic light or cycling on a footpath the only options available to gardai is are a warning or to bring the person to court.

9209958511_d1f156a033_z
A man on a bike breaking a red light

The plan would bring cycling in line with motoring and allow for out-of-court fines which are less time consuming for the gardai, the courts system and the offender. Those who do not pay the fine and context the charge in court will likely be fined a higher amount.

Cllr Cuffe said: “”We all agree that penalties need to be introduced to combat dangerous cycling, and that all cyclists must obey the rules of the road, but where is the accompanying plan to introduce safe road infrastructure that protects all road users?”

“This seems to be a ham-fisted approach at trying to solve the problem of dangerous cycling. As anyone who has cycled in a major urban centre knows, it’s a nightmare to negotiate vehicles and careless pedestrians; a problem compounded by the dangerous road infrastructure,” said Cuffe.

He added: “Many cyclists are rightly furious that the new €50 fines are larger than the penalties for parking on a cycle lane. This dangerous practice forces cyclists out into traffic and puts lives at risk. Tackling one dangerous behaviour while allowing another, more serious breach, to get less attention serves to show where the Government’s priorities lie.

He said that towns and cities across the country are still awaiting contraflow lanes that would “solve the problem of cyclists venturing the wrong way up streets”, and that cyclist-friendly traffic light systems are still absent “despite their successful introduction in many European cities”.

“Ireland is not a bike-friendly country, and until the Government acknowledges the many hazards and difficulties that cyclists face on a daily basis, these fines will do little to allay the problems we see. Minister Donohoe would be better off progressing plans to operate automated red light running detection equipment at traffic signals to penalise drivers who break the law,” said Cuffe.

Cyclist.ie, a group representing some Irish cycling campaign, said on Facebook: “We hope that the magnitude of the fine will reflect the mass/velocity of the bike and therefore its potential to do damage.”

It added: “A few of the fixed-charge fines for motoring offences that affect cyclists are set as low as €40 or 60. The highest is €80. The point will not be lost that the mass differential between a bike (approx. 14 kg) vs say a SUV (in excess of 2,000 kg), never mind the velocity differentials, would suggest that driver fines need to be markedly increased. Fair’s fair! It is the kinetic energy that should dictate the magnitude of the penalties.”

As we reported last year, 3,200 Irish cyclists were summoned to court in the last ten years. The lack of a system of “on-the-spot fines”, officially known as fix charge notices for cycling offences means that gardai must bring bicycle users to court. The same gardai must be present when the case comes before the courts. The accused will often have to take a day off work to attend court.

Hello Reader... IrishCycle.com is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for IrishCycle.com, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give IrishCycle.com's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year IrishCycle.com had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via ko-fi.com/irishcycle/tiers

Cian Ginty
Editor, IrishCycle.com

3 comments

  1. The threat a bicycle poses to other road users is 40 times lower (measured per person-km, per time it would be 200 times lower) than the threat a car poses. (source: “Fahrradverkehr und Unfallrisiko”, 6/93, Umwelt- und Prognose-Institut Germany)
    So the fines also should be around 40-200 times lower.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.