is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Warnings over 40 extra buses per hour on Dublin’s Camden St route

While welcoming the opening of the Camden Street contraflow bus lane, which was opened to cycling yesterday morning, councillor Claire Byrne (Green Party) repeated her warning about 40 extra buses per hour on the route at rush hour.
“Dublin’s south inner city probably has more cyclists than any other part of the country, and implementing a system of contraflow lanes to facilitate bike traffic is long overdue,” said Cllr Byrne. “While this system isn’t perfect, it’s a big improvement on what existed before, and I’m confident that the success of this permanent installation will act as a spur to develop further contraflow lanes in the city and make Dublin bike-friendly for all users.”
Buses and bicycles are segregated in Dutch cities such as Utrecht — making many central streets open only to bues, bicycles and access only

However Byrne warned about the extra buses at rush hour due to be diverted onto the route next week because of a Luas tram route construction.

She said: “I retain concerns about the additional bus traffic which has been directed down the Camden Street area – an additional 40 per hour – and believe that Dublin City Council and the NTA need to continuously re-examine the safety aspects of the new system, so that cyclists and pedestrians remain as safe as possible on their commute.”

The Dublin Cycling Campaign yesterday — while also welcoming the contra-flow bus lane — said it had “some concern about mixing so many buses with so many bikes on the corridor”.

As we reported yesterday, the campaign said: “It is essential that the drivers of the buses pay special attention to cyclists on this route – and, of course, essential that cyclists ride assertively and sensibly (by, for example, adopting the control road position while using the contra-flow lane). Overall though, we are optimistic that after everyone gets used to the new road layout, the new direct route out of town will improve life for those cycling in the city.”

Some general transport observers are also concerned that the extra buses will mean longer journey times for bus users and the diversions and the Luas works add to congestion.

MORE: Cycling campaign says Camden Street gyratory changes don’t go far enough
MORE: Dublin’s Camden Street contra-flow bus lane to finally go ahead is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

1 comment

  1. Cllr Claire Byrne (GP) and Dublin Cycling Campaign have rightly drawn attention to the huge numbers of buses plying our streets – cyclists are faced with a wall-of-steel these days. But it is not just buses that form the wall-of-steel it is also the coaches (Bus Eireann, Aircoach, etc) coupled with the huge numbers of taxis that make cycling in bus lanes too threatening for some.
    One must ask the question: Why are taxis without a fare on-board permitted access to the bus lane system? Taxi drivers do not have to undergo annual CPC training – bus and coach drivers do this training so have some instruction in how to interact safely with cyclists. Why is the Department of Transport and the RSA permitting this anomaly to continue?
    The city’s air quality is deteriorating due in large part to transport greenhouse gas emissions and with the fact that 74% of new vehicle registrations in 2014 were diesel-fuelled the level of particulates is increasing. Why is Dublin Bus not using LNG to power its fleet?
    Most of the bus lane network is based on a lane width of a nominal 3 m. It is not safe for a bus or coach driver to safely overtake a cyclist from within lane, particularly when the Wright/Alexander buses have wing mirrors set within the head-strike range of cyclists.
    It was interesting to observe that between 17:15 and 18:15 h last night at the ‘Bleeding Horse’ sector of the new contraflow there was not one garda on duty.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.