— Hangers used on residential streets by residents, fitting 6 bicycles in one car parking space
Bicycle hangers which aim to provide secure bicycle parking to residents of inner city Dublin could just be “an excuse to sabotage car use”, according to Conor Faughnan, the director of consumer affairs of motoring group the AA.
He said: “And what concerns me is, are the people behind this actually taking up a parking space, almost in an act of spite?”
He made his comments — which mirrors his previous comments on the quays cycle route — on The Last Word with Matt Cooper on Today FM late last week.
The bike hangers are being trialled by Dublin City Council’s DCC Beta Projects, a project of the city architect’s office which is trying on-street projects ranging from street art to bicycle facilities. The project team has detailed the reasoning for the hangers on their blog — highlighting the lack of space in city centre residential areas.
...This is not a paywall. You can keep scrolling, but IrishCycle.com needs readers like you to keep it that way. It only requires a small percentage of readers to give a bit each month or every year to keep IrishCycle.com's journalism open to all. Thank you.
The project blog also highlight how little space the hangers take up compared to a car space, but they do not put taking up a car space as an aim or benefit of the hangers.
The DCC Beta Projects blog says: “…a car is probably parked on the residential street something like 50-95% of the time. With that assumption and factoring in that the above bike hangar only occupies about 50% of a car space, it’s likely that a bike hangar actually occupies the SAME or LESS street space than an average car. For simplicity of this trial, we’re going to consider it ‘using up’ the same amount of public street as a car.”
“The bike hangers are not a bad idea… but why take a parking space? And what concerns me is, are the people behind this actually taking up a parking space, almost in an act of spite? As if that was a virtue in itself. Or are they actually looking to provide for cyclists?,” Faughnan said on Today FM.
He said: “Over 12% of AA members call themselves regular cyclists as well, and I am one of those. Everybody is in favour of improving cycling facilities, I don’t know a single person who is against it. But I’d just quiry why we are looking to displace cars, unless we think that is a virtue in itself?”
On the same show, Shane Foran of the Galway Cycling Campaign said: “If we are going to expect people to cycle to work, they have to have somewhere to park their bike. People have invested a lot of money in the bike to work scheme with the help of the taxpayer. At the same time we have had building practices where we were building a lot of high density accommodation in our towns and cities where quite often the storage facilities were simply not available. And we also have issues with people living in terrace houses.”
Faughnan said that the Bike to Work scheme and the public bicycle share systems in Irish cities have been positive, but he added: “If it’s a constructive measure designed to improve cycling facilities, then fantastic… But what I’d council against — and we’ve seen this in Dublin a lot — is do not use cycling facilities as an excuse to sabotage car use. Look to provide for its own sake and in its own right. So, I say bike hangers, absolutely. Loads of space for them everywhere, but it’s not necessary to displace a car space in order to do it.”