is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Dublin City manager says quays cycle path will help traffic flow

Dublin City Council’s manager has defended the planned Liffey Cycle Route project, saying it is needed to keep the city moving.

Planning for improvements for walking and cycling along the quays — now being named the Liffey Cycle Route — are due to be  unveiled at the Dublin City Council traffic and transport committee this afternoon. The planning of the route proceeds the new city manager and is backed by the Dublin City Development plan and other policies approved by councillors.

As we report separately today, correspondences referring to the walking and cycle route sent to the office of Owen Keegan, the manager or CEO of Dublin City Council, were released yesterday under the Freedom of Information Act to His reply letters were also release, as detailed in this article.

Keegan said: “…the City Council is very conscious of the importance of maintaining car access to the city centre in general and to the Abbey St / Henry Street / O’Connell Street area in particular, especially outside peak commuting periods, in order to support retail activity.”

He acknowledge that there are “certain trips to the city centre for which the car is not only the preferred but the only viable transport option.”

However, he said that Luas Cross City, which is already under construction from St Stephen’s Green to Broombridge just south of Finglas, will reduce the road capacity in the city centre and the cycle route will help traffic to flow.

The idea of removing space helping traffic to flow better may sound far fetched, but that’s exactly what happened in New York City when the city under its former Mayor Bloomberg gave a large chunk of space on Times Square over to walking, cycling and a pedestrian plaza.

NYC found that while motor traffic speed were lower, travel times decreased as there was less stop-start congestion where motorists went faster where roads were wider and much slower where they were forced to merge into fewer lane — much like current quays.

“Luas Cross City will reduce the availability of road capacity in the busy city centre area. If traffic is to continue to flow, then it is important that there is a reduction in overall traffic volumes,” said Keegen. “The proposed North Quays Cycle Route will assist in achieving this objective, while at the same time providing a greatly enhanced service for cyclists and pedestrians wishing to access the city centre. A congested city centre road network is unlikely to benefit retail activity.”

The manager said he does not accept that the quays project would be a “death knell” for city centre retail.

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

He said: “There is abundant evidence of traffic restriction measures having been successfully implemented in the city centre over the last two decades. In general these have enhanced the environment in the city centre and greatly increased its attractiveness to shoppers.”

He also rejected alternatives such as putting cycle lanes on current footpaths or new boardwalks — the boardwalk option is seen to have large capital and on-going costs, and concerns of how such a route could successfully interact with the city’s historic and modern bridges.

Keegen said that once public consultation on the project starts — which is expected to happen next month — that businesses and the public would be able to give their views on the project.

While there is a view that Dublin has a large amount of car restrictions in the city centre — other cities in Europe have more extensive pedestrian zones and other measures. Amsterdam, which as a very similar population and population density to Dublin, has a large retail sector and a core street network more balanced towards sustainable transport. After some objections, retailers in the Dutch capital are now reportedly looking for more of such measures.

MORE: High-end retailer “horrified” that Liffey Cycle Route will take space from motorists is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. Given the damage done to businesses in Dun Laoghaire under the County Management of Mr.Owen Keegan, I can only wish Dublin City Businesses the best of luck with him. As a long time cyclist, he left behind him a trail of disaster and waste. We have a €50,000,000 “State of the Art” Library, little usable cycle facilities and a huge proportion of closed down shops, so judge for yourselves. As for consultation, that will probably be the usual one way communication with dissenting correspondence going straight into the waste management facility, though, that might just be landfill.

  2. Hi S Boles, I genuinely hope they get it right. Sorry for the cynicism, I am just getting so used to abject failure when it comes to getting it right for cyclists. The long history of failure usually comes with a large price tag and adds weight to the already overly influential anti-cycle lobby.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.