is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Council to take second look at walking/cycling conflict in Clontarf

Following from scrapping the idea of speed ramps for bicycles on Clontarf’s promenade last year, officials at Dublin City Council are now reexamining how to reduce the conflict between people walking and cycling in the area.

The cycle route along the coast in Clontarf is part of the long-planned S2S or Sutton to Sandycove cycle route along Dublin Bay.

Last year the council abandoned its idea of speed ramps for bicycles. At the time, The Irish Times reported that the council were copying a Dutch design for cycle path speed ramps before realising that these were designed to slow down mopeds, not bicycles.

A new design is expected to be presented to the council’s North Central Area Committee meeting on April 20.

Speaking to, local councillor Cllr Naoise Ó Muirí (Fine Gael) said that the main issue is that the pedestrians have to cross the cycle-path with some cyclists going fast and with a lack of awareness of pedestrians that they are walking across a cycling route.

While the cycle path and footpath are mostly segregated by some distance in Clontarf, the problem areas are where there’s only a painted white line separating cycling and walking, and at a car park where the cycle path runs beside the parked cars and there’s no direct footpath access towards the waterside.

Cllr Ó Muirí said: “I’m the councillor who actually raised the issue with Dublin City Council about a year and a half ago based on two separate reports of collisions between pedestrians trying to get to the seafront and cyclists on the cycle-lane; one a male senior citizen and the other a young boy. I have tried to keep the issue on the agenda since then. Am fully supportive of the council taking action in this regard but not even sure that it will be enough.”

Comments from the public on the Clontarf Facebook page seem also point to a mix of problems which centres on a lack of clarity of a the current design. The issues raised include people on bicycles going too fast, parents putting children on a cycle path with unloading cars, people walking along the cycle paths rather than using the footpaths, and people walking across the cycle path without looking.

Councillor Ciarán Cuffe (Green Party), who is the chairman of the council’s transport committee said that the paths need to be clearly marked.

“Obviously the needs of pedestrians should be placed first in the transport equation, but cycling comes a close second, and it is important that pathways are clearly marked for pedestrian or cyclists’ use. Good design can generally tackle these issues and if there is a conflict perhaps some slight changes in kerbs or signage should be able to help,” he said.

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Cllr Cuffe added: “Looking ahead, the Clontarf cycle facility will be part of the ambitious Sutton to Sandycove Cycleway, and it is crucial that we iron out any design flaws at an early stage.”

(article continues below image)

Clontarf conflict points
Main Clontarf conflict points

Local TD Finian McGrath (independent) — who is known to get involved with issues of pedestrian/bicycle conflicts — told the Dublin People that he welcomed action “before someone is killed”.

Responding to McGrath’s comments, Cllr Cuffe said “Finian has raised concerns about cyclists in the past, but I wish he would spend more of his time focussing on how to improve facilities for cyclists rather than giving out about them.”

Little progress has happened in recent years on the Sutton to Sandycove route. As part of plans for a cycle network for the Greater Dublin Area, the S2S is to make up part of a longer route, the East Coast Trail, from Arklow to Drogheda. Progress along Dublin Bay has, however, been painfully slow.

Construction on a missing link of the northside section of the S2S, alongside Bull Island, is due start on April 1. Councillors in Dublin City have also joined up with councillors in Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council to try to further the project.

The project is tied to expensive coastal flood defences in parts, hampered by environmental concerns and the previous elected members of Dublin City Council voted down a €4 million link between the S2S at Fairview to the Docklands.

7623526532_b7f1d2123b_z (1)
An example of a cycle path and footpath separated by a drainage channel on a greenway in the city of Copenhagen is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. If you introduce new schemes without public education/information campaigns then there will be confusion.
    If the walking mode provision is not grade separated from the cycling then all the more reason for confusion.
    Just look at the ludicrous situation with the Chesterfield Avenue cycle track that is fully occupied by walkers who don’t take kindly to cyclists pointing out to them that the walker might be on the wrong track!
    But then we don’t do regulation in this country, do we?

  2. Got talking to some blind people last Summer who had just completed an enjoyable walk from Clontarf to Bayside. Their only problem was the lack of separation on the shared path past the Causeway. They could hear cyclists passing by but couldn’t judge how close they were or where the white dividing line was. Grade separation or a central continuous kerb would certainly help.

  3. @ Liam — I’ve updated the article above to include an example of a cycle path and footpath separated by a drainage channel on a greenway in the city of Copenhagen.

  4. A small kerb in the middle is dangerous as if you clip it or don’t realise it’s there and try to cross it you’ll come off the bike as I have before. The surface in the Danish example won’t enable roller blades or buggies or prams. As for the cycle track even the parts where you have a walking path separated by 20 meters of grass in parts along by Contarf you still have people walking along and they don’t take kindly if you tell them this. Clearer painted markings on the ground would be at least a start. The pic with the cars is a good example as once there was a car with a bike rack on the back sticking out which was lethal so how do you plan for such stupidity even from someone who cycles.

  5. @ Tom: Buggies or prams are just fine on the pedestrian surface shown in the Danish example and the drain is forgiving to any user. It’s a hard surface.

    Kerbs in general can be designed to be forgiving. See here:

    A “a walking path separated by 20 meters of grass” is a problem, not a solution. It’s bad design. As often the path 20 meters away does not serve where people want to walk — ie there’s cases on car parks or other parking close to a cycle path but no footpath access from the car park, so people walk on the cycle path.

  6. AS well as the extra kerb that been added for car overhang above, I noticed new yellow painted rumble strips? on either side of the old Tram shelter bus stop in Dollymount


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.