is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Liffey Cycle Route delayed again as councillors lobbied by local residents 

— Threat of legal action from residents
Dublin City Council has delayed presenting newly developed options for the Liffey Cycle Route to councillors and other members of the council’s transport committee. Officials had previously said they would present progressed plans at the meeting yesterday.  

It’s unclear when — if ever — the route will be further developed. It has already suffered delays in pre-planning stages and objections are mounting from retailers and local resident groups. The committee members were only told that it would be the next committee at the earliest, but no firm commitment was made when a more detailed option would be made public. 

An under-construction building is now in place on a previously planned bus detour needed for option 3 for the route, which is the most popular route chooses by members of the public in heavily reported on public consultation. Despite local speculation of use of compulsory purchase orders to buy the site, this is understood not to be an option the city is looking at.

Councillors yesterday voiced concern from local residents — a clear echo of councillor-action in 2011 ended up resulting in the council forfeiting €4 million in cycling funding and scrapping a key planned cycling link on S2S Dublin Bay, the abandoned section would have linked Fairview and the Docklands with segregated cycle paths.  

At the transport committee, Cllr Ciaran Cuffe (Green Party), Cllr Ray McAdam (FG), Cllr Mannix Flynn, (Ind), Cllr Paddy McCartan (FG), and Cllr Frank Kennedy (FF) highlighted how they had been contacted by residents. It was mentioned by councillors that residents may take legal action against the project — similar threats were made by rich residents in New York City against one of first high-profile segregated routes in that city.

City centre retailers don’t want shoppers arriving by car affected, while residents are against a rerouting of bus routes, and the realigning of parkland and a roadway. A potential plan to move parkland would allow for a car-free, river-side park with cycling and walking paths stretching from Parkgate Street to Liffey Street West (near Blackhall Place).

There are also concerns relating to the Croppy Acre Memorial Park. There are conflicting claims over the idea that there are graves for the rebels of the failed Rebellion of 1798 on the site. Some claim that there are mass graves of the rebels on the site, while others claim that the bodies were let wash way into the tidal section of river.

In the 2011 case, residents of the Eastwall area lobbied councillors to stop a key part of the long-awaited S2S route. Local residents in that case and with the Liffey route, complained of lack of public consultations and of other motives behind the project.

In 2011 it was conceded there were some issue with the consultation, however, with the Liffey Cycle Route residents are now threatening legal action over what they see as flaws in the pre-statutory consultation. This is despite the fact that it has been made clear a number of times that the consultation is not the final one, that it was one of the most widely reported on consultations, and that the public response to the consultation was the highest the city has had for any project in recent years. 

Residents in 2011 claimed the S2S and canals cycle route was linked to Dart Underground, which they were also opposing. With the Liffey route, residents have claimed that the plan is just a road-widening scheme dressed up as a cycling project.

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

A large part of an online and on-street campaign against option 3 of the Liffey route centres on the idea of road widening, although a large amount of the Liffey Cycle Route project includes road narrowing — including between Parkgate Street to Liffey Street West where the current Liffey quays roadway with three traffic lanes and a bus lane would be replaced by just two traffic lanes and a bus lane. Elsewhere on the route it was planned to removing parking and general traffic lanes.

VIEW: City council traffic committee webcast

MORE: Most popular Liffey Cycle Route option may be blocked by planned building is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. Overall the project seems to include more road narrowing and road space transferring than widening.

    One or more resident / management groups did make a sumbmission to the process. It was covered in local newspapers, national newspapers, on local and national radio, on many websites, on social media over and over — you can’t tune out of all of that and then get annoyed you did not hear about something.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.