Dept view of cycle track mandatory use a “misinterpretation”

Cycling campaigners have expressed disbelief at the view from the Department of Transport that the mandtory use of cycle tracks law was not revoked in 2012, as had been widely believed.

Calling the department’s position a misinterpretation of a law change which campaigners had warmly welcomed, Colm Ryder, chairman of, said: “As outlined in the minister’s statement at the time, and in the explanatory note accompanying SI 332/2012, the intent was to ensure that cyclists were not obliged to use cycle lanes except in very limited situations.”

...I'm sorry to disrupt you while you're reading this article, but without messages like this,'s reader-funded journalism won't survive. With 676k views so-far this year, it's not just "avid cyclists" that this website reaches. But the number of subscribers is around 0.6% of readers. This large gap between readers/subscribers is standard for non-paywall reader-supported journalism, but IrishCycle's journalism needs more support. Don't delay, support monthly or yearly today. Now, back to the article...

He added: “The latest statement from the Department of Transport’s press office indicates a completely different interpretation on mandatory use to that outlined in SI 332/2012., the Irish Cycling Advocacy Network is extremely disappointed with the department’s about turn on this issue, its clear misinterpretation of SI 332/2012, its apparent refutation of national policy on the issue, and the lack of consultation with cycling advocates.”

Shane Foran, a veteran cycling campaigner and committee member of the Galway Cycling Campaign, said: “In 2012 the Minister published regulations giving effect to the Government’s intent in this matter.  Compulsory use ended apart from contra-flow cycle tracks and cycle tracks in pedestrian zones. The new regulations were widely welcomed at the time by cycling interests. If there was any doubt on the matter, the minister’s office was free to clarify the issue and clearly they would have done so if there was any doubt.

He added: “It would appear that now four years later, some individuals in the department are attempting to offer a different interpretation of the regulations and the Minister’s intent. It is noteworthy that this new interpretation did not appear until a new minister came into office.”

“While the minister’s explanatory note is not an interpretation of the law it nevertheless acts as a guide for anyone seeking to interpret the law. The Dail record further supports the general interpretation that has been put on these regulations since their publication. In my understanding, it is open to the courts to take these sources as guidance in interpreting the law,” he said.

MORE: Mandatory cycle track law not revoked in 2012, says department


  1. The Department of Transport, Tourism & Sport is sowing a lot of confusion about its support for modal-shift to cycling to mitigate Ireland’s excessive greenhouse gas emissions from the transport sector as set out in the NCPF (2009) with its goal of 10% of all everyday trips to be made by bike by 2020.
    Along with Shane Foran, I met with the then Minister Dr. Varadkar for He confirmed to us that he had signed-off on the regulation amendment. No officials were present at our meeting save for his policy advisor.
    This begs the question why was this departmental ‘interpretaion’ not flagged with us sooner than this? We do meet regularly with officials. Left hand; right hand?


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.