is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Council defends DublinBikes against long-term criticism of deal with JCDecaux

An assistant chief executive of Dublin City Council has hit back at commentators who over the years have claimed there are issues with the deal done between the council and JCDecaux for DublinBikes. He said that the Department of the Environment, the Competition Authority, and the Gardai have all investigated the contract for the public bicycle scheme.

The deal also included a network of tourist wayfinding signs and council use of advertising for advertising public events and information campaigns.

Jim Keogan, assistant chief executive with the responsibility for planning and property, defended the contract and processes of the DublinBikes deal at a South East area committee meeting of Dublin City Council on Monday last. He was addressing councillors, including independent councillor Cllr Mannix Flynn, who is a long-term critic of the deal.

He said: “That contract — despite what you might say Cllr Flynn — was based on a competitive tendering process that was secured and won by JCDecaux, who are world leaders in relation to bike schemes. Because of their brand, because of their attention to detail, because of their ability to manage and maintain — as they are obliged to do under the terms of the contract — DublinBikes has been hugely successful and has contributed to enormously to the growth in cycling within the city.”

Keogan added: “I have to take issue with some of the comments made of the years, this contract which [the council] entered into in 2006 has been the subject of exhaustive investigation by third parties — the Department of the Environment internal audit examined it, our own internal audit examined it, as did the Competition Authority, as did the Garda Síochána.”

“I have yet to see any comment that anything untoward was done or that there was anything in way of problems associated with the contract and I’d like to put that on record because comments have been made over the years which have not been retracted in relation to the officials who dealt with the original contract and the bona fides of introducing the contract,” he said.

“I think it’s important to put on record that this has gone through due process and procedure and has been examined enormously by different groups of organisations and nothing has been found to suggest anything untoward was done.”

After the assistant chief executive spoke, Cllr Mannix Flynn said “Regarding the contracts, most of the contracts I’ve got my hands on were redacted, simply a black document,” however, it’s unclear why this would be because the contracts were released under Freedom of Information. The main contract documents were published by this site at a few years ago and additional related documents were put online last year. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.