Cycling options for crossing Liffey at East-Link under review

Options for space for cycling on the Tom Clarke Bridge (formally the East-Link Bridge) — or on a new structure beside it — are currently under assessment by Dublin City Council.

“We’re currently assessing how to put in proper pedestrian and cycling facilities on the Tom Clarke Bridge. That may be a seprate bridge beside the Tom Clarke Bridge for cyclists and pedestrians,” said Brendan O’Brien, director of traffic at Dublin City Council.

...I'm sorry to disrupt you while you're reading this article, but without messages like this,'s reader-funded journalism won't survive. With nearly 1/2 million views and 300k readers so-far this year, it's not just people who are dedicated to cycling that this website reaches. However, the number of subscribers is around 0.6% of readers. While having a large gap between readers/subscribers is standard for non-paywall reader-supported journalism, IrishCycle's journalism needs more support. Don't delay, support monthly or yearly today. Now, back to the article...

The comment was made to local councillors at a meeting of the central area committee of the council. O’Brien was giving councillors a presentation covering the Liffey Cycle Route.

The bridge is generally viewed to be cycling-unfriendly due to the heavy traffic, including large volume of trucks, and a lack of segregated space. But the detour around the bridge is up to 2.7km, including large sections of roads without dedicated space for cycling.

The Tom Clarke Bridge — which acts as a type of eastern bypass of Dublin city centre — opened to traffic in 1984 under a public private partnership (PPP) arrangement.

The bridge returned to the full ownership and control of Dublin City Council at the end of 2015, but the council has opted to maintain the toll to fund maintenance of the bridge and to fund community groups which operate in residential areas around the toll road.

The signs on the bridge for cyclists to dismount are just a request for people to do so, they are understood not to be legally binding — mainly because the text of the sign says it is a request.

...That's the end of the article. Keep scrolling if you want to the comments, but *NEEDS* readers like you to keep it that way. It only requires a small percentage of readers to give a bit each month or every year to keep's journalism open to all. Thank you.


  1. Excellent news – we’ll all need to keep an eye on this though as pedestrians need space here too and the links for peds and cyclists will need carefull design.

  2. surly a boardwalk type attachment to the bridge would be the most cost effective method. change the footpath to a bike lane and then let pedestrians use the attachment or vice versa. I can’t imagine the added weight would pose structural issue. the bridge is designed to carry several 40 ton trucks at a time.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.