No paywall and let's keep it that way. Support reader-funded journalism, subscribe today.

Mixed results as Fingal councillors narrowly support and oppose cycling motions

Councillors at a development plan meeting of Fingal County Council last night narrowly voted for and against cycling-related proposals for the county’s plan.

As we reported on Monday, Cllr David Healy (Greens) has urged residents of Fingal to contact councillors and ask them to continue to support the cycling measures in face of opposition from the council management — key votes, including cycle route to schools are expected tomorrow.

Last night, Cllr Healy said a motion to put a two year target on the planned Balbriggan to Skerries route was defeated by just one vote. AnnMarie Farrelly, director of planning at Fingal, said developing the route within 2 years was impossible, and that even developing it within the 6 years life of the county development plan was “ambitious”.

Depending on the starting point, the distance between Balbriggan to Skerries is only around 5 or 6km.

While two cycling-related motions passed by a majority of just one vote.

One of the objectives states: “Ensure that as soon as possible, but by the end of the lifetime of the Development Plan the environment in the immediate vicinity of schools is a safe and attractive low speed (30kph) environment, and drop-off by car within a given distance restricted.”

The other other stated that the council will “Review existing cycle infrastructure which was not designed in line with the Principles of Sustainable Safety in a manner consistent with the National Cycle Manual and the Design Manual for Urban Roads and Streets and undertake appropriate remedial works.”

Another motion agree to was to “Design roads and promote the design of roads including cycle infrastructure in line with the Principles of Sustainable Safety in a manner consistent with the National Cycle Manual and the Design Manual for Urban Roads and Street” was agreed without opposition. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

September subscription drive update: has reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October), but this is unlikely and so the new target is the end of the year.

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.