No paywall and let's keep it that way. Support reader-funded journalism, subscribe today.

Cycling in vogue for climate mitigation plan, but no extra funding confirmed

— Review of National Cycle Policy underway and to be finished this year.
— New policy could include yearly reduction of car parking in urban areas.

Cycling features a good deal in the draft climate change National Mitigation Plan published today, but the plan includes no new funding to make cycling safer and attractive to convince more people to swap four wheels for two.

Cycling campaigners say that the current planned spend on cycling is 1% of the €10 billion allocated to transport in the Government’s capital plan 2016-2021. Of the €10 billion earmarked for transport in the capital plan, €5.9 billion is allocated to “roads” and €3.6 billion is allocated to “public transport” — the most optimistic estimate seen by of the spending planned on cycling amounts to just 2%.

Elsewhere in the National Mitigation Plan, it is outlined how that the National Cycle Policy is under review and how a review will be “published later this year”.

The draft plan states: “In April 2009, the Government published the first National Cycle Policy Framework. It outlined 19 high level objectives containing 109 actions, aimed at ensuring that a strong cycling culture is developed in Ireland. The Framework set a target that 10% of all journeys will be made by bicycle by 2020. A Review of the National Cycle Policy Framework is currently underway and will be published later this year”.

The plan also includes a potential expansion of the Bike to Work Scheme tax support scheme, but it does not provide any details of how this would be done.

Other measures under consideration include possable ” increased and accelerated” public transport investment, extra incentives to increase the take up of “low emission vehicles”, including  hybrids or fully electric cars; and increased use of biofuels in transport.

Potential “longer-term” measures for transport include reducing the top speed limit on motorways from 120km/h to 110km/h and a parking policy.

The parking policy would include a review of both car and bicycle parking nationally. The draft plan states: “A comprehensive national policy on parking should be developed. It should include motorised vehicles and bicycles and Local Authorities should be provided with guidelines to support its implementation as they are responsible for parking provision, planning and related matters.”

It adds: “By reducing the public parking supply by a small percentage every year in urban centres, more space would be available to facilitate services and infrastructure for pedestrians, cyclists, and public transportation. However, any change to parking supply in urban centres would have to be considered in tandem with policies on ‘out-of-town’ parking. A national parking policy would have to complement demand management measures and developments in ITS in context of the EU’s Smart Cities Initiative.”

Written submissions on the draft National Mitigation Plan can be made by Wednesday 26 April 2017. The Department of Communications, Climate Action and Environment said today that submissions can be made by emailing and including the subject heading “Draft NMP consultation and (name of respondent)”.

MORE: Draft National Mitigation Plan (PDF)

UPDATE: Shortly after publication, this article was edited to include a more inviting headline and to cover a broader range of the measures planned. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

September subscription drive update: has reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October), but this is unlikely and so the new target is the end of the year.

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. Jaysus lads deeyou are putting an awful lot of pressure on us about this global warming, we’d better do something. Any ideas? How about a plan boss? A “mitigation plan”, we could call it, keep em off our backs for bit. Great idea, what’d we put in it? You got me there boss. Mary, will you call Eamon Ryan’s secretary and get her to send over their last manifesto and any reports on emissions and that they have lying around? Plenty of material there. Jimmy you take a look and throw that together for me by next week. Keep it vague, don’t promise anything, and put anything that might annoy the feckin AA on the long finger. Now, anything else or are we done? Nothing? Grand, we’ll adjourn to the Dail bar so, quare thirsty after a hard mornings work.

  2. The plan sounds a bit like a Trump plan – ie fluff and bluster and nothing of any use, and effectively just BS >:(


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.