is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

This roundabout says a lot about how cycling is treated in Ireland

Outside Sligo town is a roundabout which mimics the issues with many Irish cycle routes — it could be anywhere in the country as the problems it highlights are common to other roundabouts and different types of junctions across Ireland, even very new ones.

The roundabout in question is on the Dublin Road at the Sligo Retail Park. The road as a national route is bypassed by the N4 dual carriageway.

ALSO READ: If Ireland wants cycling friendly streets, we need Dutch-style roundabouts.

This is outbound: away from the town: Most of the cycling element of this design were cheaply placed on top of existing footpaths, as has happened in many Irish towns and cities.

The dividing of the footpath splits it in half.

Just to fill in the picture here: needless two-lane entry for motorists entering the roundabout which puts a slight bit of extra capacity over safety cycling put on footpath and no buffer space between people and vehicles.

The road on both sides of the roundabout narrows to a single lane.

Many cyclists don’t want to use the footpath and, so, the council feel they have to tell them to do so with a sign. Such shared paths were not covered by mandatory use.

As the footpath cycle lane turns in towards the business park we see two things:

  1. Anybody continuing along the main road and following the footpath is now at a really awkward angle to cross the road and effectively have to not only yield but stop.
  2. No cycle route into the business park or the housing estate behind it (this is the access road to the housing estate). Nobody living there will ever want to cycle and cyclists don’t go to Smyth’s Toys, McDonalds, computer shops etc.

This is the crossing — again needless two lanes but not enough space for a central refuge where you can feel safe walking or cycling.

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

This is the crossing again, with this image taken when looking back after crossing the road.

The footpath is again split but we’re not suggesting a totally shared footpath is the solution here — cycling and walking should have their own space.

If you’re cycling out of the business park and make the mistake of joining the shared footpath, you then have to deal with an uncontrolled crossing which isn’t clear to motorists.

Note also the cycle lane ends sign and the “cyclists rejoin main carriageway” signs. There’s three points about these: (1) the two signs  are both placed incorrectly here rather than up a bit where the shared path ends, (2) the cycle lane ends sign should be a shared path ends sign and should be followed by a cycle track (lane) starts sign, (3) the written sign should not exist, it’s a sign of design failure.

Here’s where the cycle route rejoins the carriageway — every time I’ve passed here before the day I was taken these photos, cars or trucks entered the cycle lane when rounding the corner.

The other side of the roundabout is a bit better for cycling but only because there no road linked to it — just don’t try to turn into the business park! is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. Yep, this is the ubiquitous situation all over Ireland. A total clusterfuck for people wanting to walk or cycle. The road layouts are completely hostile to anyone who isn’t in a car. Really really horrible to cycle on. Always checking your six to make sure you’re not going to be flattened by an idiot in a vehicle who couldn’t be bothered to slow down, as clearly their lives are far too important to not be going at 100kph and checking their phone at the same time.

    I used to race bikes when I was younger in the late 80s and early 90s. Many roads were still small and narrow, and most traffic was forced to slow down to manage all the twists and turns. Then we got a massive influx of EU infrastructure funding and massive amounts of road building and road widening went on all over the place. After all this road widening, all the places I used to cycle along quite happily (with the odd incident with a moron in a car) now became totally obnoxious places to go near on a bike.

    And I don’t know if it’s just my negative perception now, but the increased speeds that motorists seem to expect to go along these new ‘improved’ roads seems to have bleed over into their expectation of how fast they should drive on ALL roads. There now seems to be a mad panic-like state amongst many people in cars as they try to get from A to B in as short a time as is humanly possible with reckless care paid to other VRUs. :(


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.