is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

New N11 junction planned with unprotected and shared cycle lanes

— New junction unfriendly to cycling and walking is part of access for Cherrywood.

Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council is planning a new sub-standard junction on the N11 with shared surfaces around bus stops and cycle lanes exposed to left hand slip turns.

The council said: “The Cherrywood Planning Scheme requires a new link road at the north east sector of the planning scheme to provide connectivity with Dún Laoghaire and Dublin City. This link road is referred to as the Druids Glen Road. It will access the N11 at Junction Q.”

People walking and cycling who are exiting the new link road and traveling south at the new T-junction will have four staggered pedestrian crossings to cross — or people cycling can risk crossing three traffic lanes a short distance before the junction and then cross the 8-lane wide section of the N11.

Commuters and others who currently cycle northbound on a cycle path will now be put across a shared area at a bus stop before quickly ending up on a unprotected cycle lane and exposed to traffic turning into a left hand slip turn. The unprotected cycle lane will continue for some distance north of the junction before reverting to a cycle path.

People cycling and walking from north (the city direction) into Cherrywood will have to cross two shared staggered crossings with shared footpath space around the crossings and at bus stops at the junction.

A report and drawings on the planned project can be found at

The council said that submissions or observations with respect to the works, can be made on the same page via an online submission form.

A sample of the drawings:

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

1 comment

  1. Could they not remove the central median and give more road with to a protected cycle lane? Surely this road could move just as smoothly at lower speeds and tighter lanes? Why have a full dual-carriageway in an urban setting anyway? Reduce speed, reduce pollution, keep the flow moving, and offer safe and free-flowing transit and active transport in the same space.

    Or are road engineers still road engineers and not allowed to think of other idea’s other than a lick of paint?


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.