is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

UCD access project at Clonskeagh Road lacks vision

COMMEMT & ANALYSES: A redesign of a section of the Clonskeagh Road at the entrances to University College Dublin is planned by Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council and the National Transport Authority, but the project lacks vision.

For context, this project will be linked to another short upgraded section already completed and will also link to a stalled project to upgrade the route from UCD into the city centre via Ranelagh.

The completed project was between the UCD entrances in the new project and Bird Avenue / Rosemount Crescent (as part of the Luas-UCD-Dart route). The larger route which is stalled due to lack of funding is the City centre to Sandyford (Clonskeagh) Cycle Route, which will mostly be a Dublin City Council project.

There are three entrances to UCD within the area of the proposed project — two which allow for  motoring access and one which doesn’t.

Maybe the officials are right for not having vision? The National Transport Authority’s design guidance in the National Cycle Manual is lacking when it comes to the need to separate bicycles and buses, and totally out of sink on best practice on segregated cycle routes.

What do I mean by lack of vision? Here’s some examples:

  1. Simply working with what’s there — not, for example, looking at changing the UCD access arrangements, so that cars are restricted to one entrance and cycling and walking are given priority at the other entrance currently open to cars. Or looking at bus stop locations.
  2. Lack of vision to see that “bus stop bypasses” or “floating bus stops” are a must — the Dutch started to think this way decades ago and the UK is comming around to this idea. Fitting them in isn’t the easiest thing but it’s far from impossible.
  3. Lack of vision for proper segregation — even light segregation (which now seems to be the preferred design for councils and the NTA) is lacking in this project. Note in the images below how the light blue which depicts light segregation isn’t very common compared to the red which marks out cycle tracks. There isn’t a protect junction in the scheme.

There’s some fairly dreadful features in the project (like the continued use of shared crossings and shared footpath surfaces and tiny turning pockets), but mainly the issue is a lack of vision and direction.

If the design goes ahead it will likely need another redesign within years.

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

1 comment

  1. As you rightly say Cian, the blinkered view is one of ‘how can we work with what we have’ instead of ‘how do we achieve what we need’.

    It’s just so frustrating to realise what the Dutch do and compare it to the crap non-vision here.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.