COMMENT & ANALYSIS: “‘Drivers in the city are like smokers in our children’s bedrooms,’ says me on Dutch telly last night,” tweeted Dr Steven Fleming, a cycling and architect expert.
Is Fleming’s view just controversial? Or is it a fact too few people are unwilling to accept? Do we keep ignoring the dryly communicated warnings from the EPA, and warnings from obesity experts? Even when those warnings aren’t so dry, why don’t we listen more?
Fleming’s phrasing is at the extreme end, but it’s hard to complain at all about cars without being marked as an “anti-car zealots” by the AA.
Cars have their use but we use them too much is the view of many cycling campaigners and others, but this is classed simply as anti-car.
Meanwhile, the AA’s spin doctor makes bogus claims that a family of five breathing is a larger emissions problem than a new car, and that emissions from cars are overall reducing (both on the AA’s site and to the Oireachtas Transport Committee).
The AA — a car insurance company with a big conflict of interest — are given a free rein on the airwaves to complain about projects which improve the city and continue to be viewed as safety experts even after the AA made a submission to increase speed limits on city centre and residential streets in Dublin.
Why even mention the AA in this article? Their treatment on radio shows contrasts with anybody who tries to suggest excessive car isn’t good for society.
Public transport, we’re told, is rubbish and cycling is dangerous, but we’re often told this by the people arguing against improving cycling and public transport.
But did Fleming go too far? What he said is accurate, although maybe it’s too stark for a sensitive audience? But maybe — like road safety adverts or health warnings — people need to be shocked? It might not be a total solution but a part of a mix of solutions.
Playing too nicely while the likes of the AA make stuff up and get away with it hasn’t worked so far.
September subscription drive update: IrishCycle.com has reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October), but this is unlikely and so the new target is the end of the year.
If you can help push IrishCycle.com above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!
Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.
IrishCycle.com is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.
There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for IrishCycle.com, it just needs enough people like you to believe!
Monthly subscriptions will give IrishCycle.com's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year IrishCycle.com had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.
I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.
The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!
But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via ko-fi.com/irishcycle/tiers