is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Fianna Fáil want electric cars in bus lanes but campaigners warn of increased danger

Electric cars should be allowed in bus lanes in Irish cities to promote a move away from petrol and diesel vehicles, Fianna Fáil said today, but cycling campaigners warn of increased danger.

Fianna Fáil spokesperson on communications, energy and natural resources, Timmy Dooley TD, defended the suggestion when pressed on it on Today with Sean O’Rourke on RTE Radio One this morning, saying that radical action was needed for cleaner transport.

On the Today with Sean O’Rourke show, Dooley said that he would envisage that access to bus lanes for electric cars would be at least for five years.

He pointed to Norway as an example, but the move to allow electric cars in Norwegian bus lanes left public transport users compiling of delays due to clogged bus lanes.

The Norwegian Public Roads Administration found that electric cars represented 85% of traffic in bus lanes during rush hour on one road in Oslo and the plug was pulled on the incentive after only three years.

Cycling campaigners said that people cycling are only offered limited protection in bus lanes and that introducing electric cars into bus lanes would be an extra hazard.

Colm Ryder, a spokesman for the, said: “Electric cars in bus lanes is a recipe for increased congestion, more inefficient public transport, and increased danger for vulnerable cyclists. This idea must be recognized for the cheap publicity stunt it is. An attempt to go forward by going backwards.”

The new call for electric car promotion for cities follows a warning last year from a top UK advisory on the health effects of pollution that electric cars are not the answer for cities.

“Our cities need fewer cars, not just cleaner cars. One issue is that electric vehicles will not sufficiently reduce particulate matter (PM), the other toxic pollutant emitted by road transport. This is because PM components include not only engine emissions, but also a contribution from brake and tyre wear and road surface abrasion,” Frank Kelly, professor of environmental health at Kings College London, wrote in the Guardian.

Kelly, who is the chairman of the UK government advisory committee on the medical effects of air pollutants, added: “Governments don’t currently pay much attention to PM, but it is in fact highly polluting, with strong links to cardiopulmonary toxicity.”

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

The World Health Origination states that there is no safe limit to particulate matter pollution and non-engine sources are estimated to amount to well over half of such emissions.

In a statement today, Dooley said, “Minister Naughten is exclaiming the virtues of the Electric Vehicle Home Charger Grant. The introduction of this grant is a positive development, but it must be recognised that significant hurdles remain to be overcome for those looking to convert to electric vehicles. The Government needs to introduce a greater package of measures to help incentivise the use of electric vehicles.

The measures suggested by the party include the removal of motor tax on electric vehicles for five years, eliminating motor tolls for five years, and rolling out more fast-charge points across the road network to remove any threat of range anxiety, and extending the 0% BIK (Benefit in Kind) rate to from the current one year to five years to give certainty for fleet owners.

Dooley added: “There also need to be a commitment that the network of fast-charge points will be maintained to a high standard in the years ahead. Many people who have considered moving to electric vehicles have failed to do so as they are worried that the investment in the fast-charging network will not continue, leaving them with an unreliable mode of transport. Access to bus lanes to encourage uptake of electric vehicles in cities also needs to be addressed.” is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. Short-term thinking. What happens a significant percentage of or even most cars are electric and we tell them they can’t use the bus lanes anymore? And by that stage they will also have to be charged additional tax to make up for fuel duty losses.

  2. I would certainly make Michael O’Leary happy. He could get rid of the fake taxi and just get a Tesla instead.

    This would increase congestion for busses so the answer to the TDs question should be an easy no. I don’t even see this is a cycling issue although obviously the more traffic in the bus lanes the worse they are for cyclists. Possibly he is only listening to Brown Thomas / Dublin Town / The AA for ‘expert’ opinion on this though. With the trend towards electric cars this will effectively end up in the elimination of bus lanes completely.

    Will the guards be able to easily tell which cars are electric and which are not? Will this be for electric only or hybrid cars?

    If you want to further incentivise electric cars then a congestion charge which electric cars would not have to pay seems like a better idea than hampering public transport.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.