is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Dundalk leaves cycling off the agenda in town centre plan

— Scheme includes wide traffic lanes and car parking but no cycling provisions.
— Plans keep one-way roads system at Bridge Street and Linenhall St.
— No links to the town’s fragmented cycle network.

Dundalk councillors have approved a public realm plan on some of the town’s key streets without any provision for cycling, besides a small number of bicycle stands.

The Part 8 planning for the Clanbrassil Street and the St Nicholas Quarter scheme was approved by Louth Country Council last week.

The project’s screening report claims that the “proposal involves narrowing of the traffic lanes and tightening corner radii at junctions to better facilitate on-road cycling”, but campaigners in Ireland and the UK point out that such schemes where there is no traffic reduction measures makes cycling less attractive, lowers permeability for cycling and often increases the risk.

While the design reports claims that “Measures to promote safer cycling within the town centre have been carefully balanced with the needs and profile of the wider pedestrian community profile,” but this does not mention the large amount of space kept for both car parking and general traffic lanes.

The design report added: “Cycling will be accommodated through the provision of a number of secure cycle stands throughout the scheme. Dedicated cycling lanes are not proposed as cycling will also share the lower speed town centre environment facilitated by the redesign of the central carriageway.”

The lack of space for cycling is despite the Dundalk development plan objective to “encourage a modal shift away from dependency on the private motor car to public transport, walking and cycling.”

Only the engineering report mentions a claim of “insufficient street space to provide fully segregated cycle facilities considering the pedestrian, parking / loading and traffic requirements” — in plain English the designers were told to give priority to parking and motor traffic movements.

At the northern end of the scheme a one-way system is kept around Bridge Street and Linenhall St — this effects not just north-south cycling movements but also east-west movements, including routes to schools.

The lead project designers for the council are BDP (formally Building Design Partnership). The company has offices in the Netherlands, but the Dundalk project doesn’t even follow Irish cycling policy — for example, wide one-way streets are left planned without any contra-flow provision for cycling.

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Among the firm’s recently approved work in Ireland was a new school building and grounds for St Mary’s Secondary School in Ballina, Co Mayo. The plans for the school’s cycleways were left disconnected and not joined directly to existing cycle tracks, leaving the council’s traffic department to question how people on bicycles would cross the road.

Ollan Herr of Dundalk Cycling Alliance told the Dundalk Democrat: “We all know that so many short car journeys in Dundalk can be done instead on a bike, if only it was safe to do so; if only we had more European style traffic separated cycleways.”

In a statement Herr said the lack of segregated cycling facilities is “frustrating” in the face of warnings about carbon emissions and the “growing problems of ill-health as a result of our lethargic lifestyle.”

Herr separately welcomed a commitment from the council’s chief executive to have her engineers begin plans for a cycle way to continue from McEntee Avenue – past St Malachy’s / Friary National schools and into the Long Walk.

He said: “We think this was very generous of her to make this commitment. We are also very enthusiastic about her commitment to connect the railway station to the town centre.” is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

1 comment

  1. That’s DMURS for you – or at least local authority interpretation of it. Shared space is the current fashion because government does not have to invest in segregated cycling facilities which are expensive if done right and don’t have to restrict motorised traffic which would be unpopular.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.