is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Judicial review must be considered for College Green, says Greens

— Planners’ transport report was “quite dated and fails to reflect current transport policy”.

Dublin City Council should consider all options for advancing with a plan for a plaza at College Green, said the chairman of the city’s transport committee and Green Party councillor Ciarán Cuffe.

A report by Dick Brady, the council’s assistant chief executive, has been issued to councillors in recent days and to be discussed at the council’s monthly meeting tomorrow. It outlines three options:

  1. To seek a Judicial Review in relation to the decision of An Bord Pleanála. An application in this regard must be lodged within 8 weeks of the decision to refuse.
  2. To lodge a new application to An Bord Pleanála for the Plaza and traffic management measures having regard to the An Bord Pleanála decision.
  3. To abandon the Plaza proposal at this time and proceed to make the necessary alterations to traffic management arrangements in this area to address the competing transport demands that must be addressed using the Councils own powers as a roads authority.

Cllr Cuffe said: “A car-free College Green is a ‘must-have’ project for Dublin. At this stage we must ask, was An Bord Pleanála’s decision-making process flawed? It is a matter of concern that Daniel O’Connor, the Board’s Inspector on Traffic and Transportation said ‘it appears anomalous to expect that all increases in transportation demand can be dealt without any additional road space provision.’ This view is quite dated and fails to reflect current transport policy.”

He added: “I believe it contradicts the National Transportation Authority’s 2016-2035 Strategy. It seems curious that the Inspector questioned the Council’s traffic modelling on the basis of merely two car trips that he himself had taken. Judicial review must be considered. Let’s see what the lawyers say.”

Cllr Cuffe said that councillors should approve the report and seek the views from the council’s legal advisers. He said: “If we decide not to seek judicial review of the Board’s decision we should go back to the drawing board and undertake pedestrian improvements that don’t require approval from An Bord Pleanála, or submit revised plans.”

“Ultimately we must provide a quality transport system for all, and if that requires taking space from cars to provide for other road users then so be it. It is time that we gave space back to pedestrians in Dublin City Centre. Wider footpaths help, but a pedestrian plaza at College Green would be a game-changer,” Cllr Cuffe concluded. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

1 comment

  1. I agree with Cllr Cuffe. But what do the major party reps have to say on this? Ultimately they will be the deciding votes on any proposal.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.