IrishCycle.com is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Why we urgently need better cycling route design even if most cycling projects are stalled

COMMENT & ANALYSIS: Based on covering the same design flaws over and over again, IrishCycle.com launched the CyclingForAll.ie campaign to try to improve standard in cycling design — this article covers another reason why we urgently need improved standards.

As more housing and roads are planned and built, the more CyclingForAll.ie is key. Improved standards is not something that can wait until after cycling gets more funding.

People involved with cycling (including the editor of this website) too often think about cycling projects, but improved standards for — and an improved way of thinking about — cycling infrastructure needs also to apply to housing, schools, universities, around large road projects, with the likes of the planned MetroLink in Dublin and many other types of projects both publicly and privately developed.

Today, the Limerick Cycle Design twitter account used Mungret Gate — a housing developed 5km from Limerick City Centre — as a solid example of common problematic designs which are still being implemented. The development is by the Homeland Group but it should be stressed that these are still common issues and Limerick City and County Council should be picking up on this issues..

The developer boosts: “Mungret Gate is ideally located just 5km from Limerick City Centre. Set in a well-established and well-serviced area, the homes at Mungret Gate benefit from peaceful countryside surroundings with plenty of activities nearby including a playground, stunning scenery and 2km of walk and cycle paths.”

The reality of the cycle paths is stunning for all the wrong reasons as Limerick Cycle Design explains:

It gets worse…

A basic of segregation for cycling in the Netherlands is to segregate at tricky points first (ie junctions and bus stops etc), but in Ireland we do it the other way around:


You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.


Users of minor side roads and private entrances should be yield footpaths and cycle paths, and design should reenforce this. But again the opposite is happening:

In the original design there was no pedestrian crossings to cross the main road at the entrance to this housing development but somebody — maybe the designers, audit team or the council — decided that was a bit too car-centric.

But the crossings installed are shared Toucan crossings — these mix walking and cycling and, for that reason, are disliked by both cycling advocates and disability groups. Usually the design isn’t very usable by people on bike:

The development very close to a primary school but nobody thought of joining the cycling infrastructure up:

And the final tweet from Limerick Cycle Design has a key message: “So, if you’re interested in better transport and planning in Limerick, consider voting for someone who you think is genuinely interested in same. #LocalElections2019”.

***

You can check which councillors and candidates are signed up to CyclingForAll.ie on this spreadsheet and send councillors and candidates not signed up to do so via http://cyclingforall.ie/cllrs/

IrishCycle.com is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: IrishCycle.com reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push IrishCycle.com above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

***

IrishCycle.com is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for IrishCycle.com, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give IrishCycle.com's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year IrishCycle.com had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via ko-fi.com/irishcycle/tiers

Cian Ginty
Editor, IrishCycle.com

2 comments

  1. One of the big issues for me is that national design guidance (for what it’s worth) is ignored, or varied at will, with no consequences for the specifier, designer, contractor or road safety auditor.
    Unless the designers (generally private road engineering consultancies) have been abroad to undertake a post-graduate qualification in infrastructure design for cycling it will be of hit-and-miss quality. Irish universities do not offer such courses as far as I know.
    The ultimate funder of most of the cycle path, track or lane infrastructure is the Department of Transport. It does not have the capacity to audit the projects of road authorities to ensure design and construction compliance.
    This was foreseen in the National Cycling Policy Framework of 2009.

    Reply
  2. The government have said that €3 billion spent on rural broadband will have benefits beyond what the costs suggest.

    Maybe….. I haven’t seen any concrete figures on that beyond official spin. But maybe.

    However, it HAS been proven that investment in safe segregated cycle infrastructure does indeed result in a net benefit to society, well beyond the initial costs. So how come we aren’t seeing €3 billion being invested in safe segregated cycle infrastructure ! How come we aren’t seeing a governmental push to promote an all-Ireland cycle-network that would join all the towns and villages and give some freedom back to rural dwellers who are increasingly becoming trapped by car-culture.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.