No paywall and let's keep it that way. Support reader-funded journalism, subscribe today.

Should Dublin trial a protected cycle network even if it means facing down opposition?

COMMENT & ANALYSIS: Should Dublin trial a protected cycle network for 8-12 months and see if people want to go back afterwards? This isn’t an easy thing to do but it can be done quickly and for a relatively small amount of money.

Last week on Twitter I suggested a that Dublin City Council needs to up its game on cycling by trialing such a fast-build bicycle network. Before writing about this further, I’m posting the Twitter thread here for reference as well as for the benefit of those who did not see the Twitter thread: is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

September subscription drive update: has reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October), but this is unlikely and so the new target is the end of the year.

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. Yes Yes Yes.All the best salesmen will go out of their way to let their prospective customer experience the product sure in the knowledge that when you see it in action you wont want to go back.So many projects that could make the city a better place to live are killed off using whatever argument is necessary to defeat it even when the reasons stated have nothing to do with the real reason it is being opposed.Let us make plans for a city designed for the good of its citizens and stop providing priority for the storage of private property on public spaces i.e parking.If when everyone sees the project in action they still reject it then we must accept it may need to be changed or abandoned but projects which prove popular with the people should get maximum support and priority.
    Business exists to serve the people.If people suffer so business can thrive it is time to change the business.

  2. Yes, a trial run is a great way to get a feel for a new concept. Could the Council run something under the Beta project template?


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.