IrishCycle.com is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

River Liffey’s first walking and cycling bridge proposed for the Dublin Docklands

The River Liffey’s first walking and cycling bridge is proposed for the Dublin Docklands, according to a report issued to the Dublin City Council transport committee.

The bridge is slightly east of a previously proposed bridge which ran into panning difficulties due to its possible interactions with a Dart Underground station.

The council state that the bridge is needed includes easing cycling and walking congestion on the nearby bridges and aiding with the transport needs for the area which is still undergoing development.

If approved, the twin opening bridge is to be 125m long and include segregated space for walking and cycling — with a cycle path in the middle of the bridge which 4 metres usable space and footpaths on both sides of a width of 3-2.5 metres each.

The council report said that is proposed to submit the planning application to An Bord Pleanála in early 2020, subject to receiving approval for the amendment to the North Lotts and Grand Canal SDZ Planning Scheme. Assuming the scheme is approved, it is anticipated that construction will start in mid-2021 and will take approximately 18 months to complete.

On the need for the bridge, the council report said: “The nearest existing bridges to the proposed Blood Stoney Bridge are the Samuel Beckett Bridge to the West, and the East Link Bridge to the East. Both of these are primarily vehicular crossings and are already operating at full capacity for pedestrian and cyclists at peak times1.”

It continued: “The SDZ Planning Scheme 2014 contained two new pedestrian bridges across the River Liffey. The original bridge location indicated in the SDZ planning scheme showed a bridge linking Forbes Street to Park Lane. Preliminary studies for a new bridge near Forbes Street commenced in 2015. The North Lotts and Grand Canal SDZ Planning Scheme did not explicitly consider the interaction between the proposed bridge at Forbes Street and planned DART Underground. Proposed Scheme.”

It added: “The preliminary studies identified significant technical and procedural challenges related to constructing a bridge above the proposed Dublin Area Rapid Transit (DART) Underground. A bridge at the Forbes St location would have an unacceptable detrimental effect on the DART Underground project. This has led DCC and the NTA to reject Forbes Street as a viable location for the bridge.”

The new report outlines that the new proposal “Removes all interference with the DART Underground project; Provides a more uniform spacing of river crossing; Eastward shift in desire lines for pedestrian and cyclists due to development of North Docks Area” and that “Traffic modelling figures predict very high usage figures for the Blood Stoney Bridge location.”

Here’s artist’s impressions and other draft images:


You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.


IrishCycle.com is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: IrishCycle.com reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push IrishCycle.com above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

***

IrishCycle.com is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for IrishCycle.com, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give IrishCycle.com's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year IrishCycle.com had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via ko-fi.com/irishcycle/tiers

Cian Ginty
Editor, IrishCycle.com

3 comments

  1. This is good news and is welcomed. It’s in a reasonable location for commuters moving north – south over the Liffey but who need to go/come from the Sandymount / Blackrock areas. The one thing that will need to be upgraded is the cycle infrastructure on roads leading up to the new bridge on both sides of the Liffey. A lot more people on bikes will obviously be using the roads leading directly to the new bridge once it’s built, and at the moment there’s zero in the way of traffic segregation. The roads are narrow and with a lot more people on bikes, they’ll need to be protected.

    But overall this new bridge looks very positive.

    Reply
  2. Nice design. Some remarks: the effective width for safe and comfortable cycling on the bridge is less than the designed 4.0 meter. Due to (natural) clearance of cycling along walls 0.625 meter on each side is ‘lost’. This fear of obstacles is explained in all Dutch Cycle Manuals since the very first edition in 1993.The Irish National Cycle Manual (originally inspired by the Dutch edition) even notes 0.65 m for walls, fences, crash barriers; paragraph 1.5.2. Widt calculator.
    Fortunately the shared idea of mixing pedestrians and cyclists and the junctions on both ends of the bridge has not been applied (this time…).
    The positioning of bollards to avoid car traffic entering the bridge is curious. And managing ‘conflicts’ between pedestrians and cyclists (coming from / going to the bridge) with “pedestrian crossing traffic signals with low level cycle signals” is a typical Irish road safety approach and can and will be ignored by both pedestrians and cyclists at that particular spot.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.