is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

With cycling and urban design, should Ireland follow the Netherlands or Denmark?

COMMENT & ANALYSIS: It can be sometimes hard to get across to people why I think Ireland should follow the Netherlands rather than Denmark in cycling and urban design… when I try to explain, “I’d settle for Copenhagen” is often the reply.

Or it’s dismissed as “just details” which can be worked out.

A video titled “Copenhagen is Great … but it’s not Amsterdam” is one of the latest published by ‘Not Just Bikes’, a YouTube channel.

The video gives a broad overview of why the Dutch modal of cycling and urban design is the better one to follow.

Not to be cliched, but it’s really not just about bikes — the differences are broader, including more trees and wide-ranging traffic calming.

The only problem with the video is that Not Just Bike concludes that the Copenhagen model can be a stepping stone to what the Netherlands has — there’s two main problems with this especially for an Irish context: (1) Copenhagen still isn’t making the jump to being more like the Netherlands and if we follow them for 10 years we’re unlikely to as well, and (2) we don’t have their huge roads.

Even with Copenhagen’s generally larger roads, Not Just Bike describes the cycling infrastructure there as feeling as tacked on.

Mark from BicycleDutch also compared both approaches in his post titled “Is Copenhagen a City of Cyclists?” in 2018.

A key point in the result of the differences is in a caption:

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

“The girl in the pink coat was one of the few children I saw cycling in the city. I was in the city on a Thursday until late afternoon, a Saturday and a Sunday, days you would expect to see children cycling, but I didn’t. I saw more children in a cargo bike than there were on their own bicycle.”

This is BicycleDutch’s video:

On the basics of the differences in cycling and street design make sure to also check out Robert Weetman’s blog posts (1, 2, 3) on the issue compare the UK to Denmark and the Netherlands — the Irish street and road design is basically UK design with few differences.

Weetman uses really helpful and easy to understand diagrams, like this one and he also has images of the treatments used on different streets of types and sizes.

ADDED: ‬‪This tweet from the guys at Modacity — authors of the great book ‘Building the Cycling City: The Dutch Blueprint for Urban Vitality’ — sums up a lot.

Although, the ‘ban cars’ part of the graphic they share is best read as ‘restrict car’, ie in a Dutch context it would include some bus/bike and bike only streets, but it would more often include streets where cars only use for access to their homes, where rat running is blocked and streets are more than just for transport.


The Netherlands is not perfect and not everything in Dutch cycling infrastructure should be copied, but the overall approach is far better than Denmark in terms of cycling safety and comfort, making space for other things like trees and asking questions around the politics of space.

On the politics of space it has to be said that the system in the Netherlands is better than that in Denmark at asking about the politics of space.

The Dutch vary in how successful they are at asking the questions around how they use street and road space — in some cases, they got it wrong in some cases 30 years ago or more and left it that way for decades, and cities and regions differ in how successful they are.

The politics of space is a messy business. A key advantage the Dutch have is their systematic approach — from building cycle networks that doesn’t just include cycle paths on large roads, to “sustainable” or systematic safety which starts by asking the function of different roads and streets and designing them accordingly.

That approach doesn’t stop at the edge of towns — the Dutch systematic approach includes rural areas too.

If we go with the Denmark approach we already know what happens when you try to just tack cycle paths onto a city with a road network that is generally narrower.

Choose wisely. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. I never really understood why Copenhagen is considered the top cycling city that can serve as an example to all other cities. As a Belgian, when I visited it a few years ago I did not see any difference with large Belgian cities. Most of those cities have now greatly overtaken Copenhagen. Even cities in other counties are now better.

    I am glad the genie is out of the bottle and we are coming to the realisation that the Dutch figured it out decades ago. Their holistic approach to cycling is truly remarkable and are the example to follow

  2. Regardless of whether we should be following Amsterdam or Copenhagen (and I agree with you on NL), we need to stop copying UK road design and UK traffic modelling.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.