No paywall and let's keep it that way. Support reader-funded journalism, subscribe today.

Interim version of Dublin’s Fitzwilliam cycle route installed

An interim version of the delayed Fitzwilliam cycle route is in the process of being installed by Dublin City Council. The project is funded by the Department of Transport via the National Transport Authority.

Despite the design being bog standard internationally, the parking-protected aspect of the project is still seen as controversial by some local councillors and a local residents association.

Having a cycle lane or path inside parked is used limitedly in Dublin to date, but a section has been used between Smithfield and Stoneybatter for decades and is more widely used in Cork. But a parking protected lane was installed on Lombard Street over a year ago, and, since then, on Bridgefoot Street and Parkgate Street.

The Fitzwilliam route — which is just 1km long — underwent 20 different public and stakeholder engagements. At one public meeting, an attendee accused a councillor of being a “racist” because the cycle route which he first proposed was for foreigners and for tourists, not residents.

As part of an on-going investigation by this website on the delays to cycle routes in Dublin, Dublin City Council in June told this website: “Fitzwilliam Cycle Route: The issuing of construction tender documents has been deferred to December 2020. This is a result of problems encountered in the detailed design of the drainage system. This means that the permanent scheme will not be completed before Q4 2021. In the meantime, DCC will implement interim measures along the route in order to improve safety for cyclists.” is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

September subscription drive update: has reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October), but this is unlikely and so the new target is the end of the year.

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

1 comment

  1. just cant see why they dont use the dooring width standard which these schemes follow ie 1 meter minimum up to 1.5 meters like seen all over america who use these well.Thats the main problem with these as a car or van door on the passenger side can hit a cyclist easily when opened


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.