No paywall and let's keep it that way. Support reader-funded journalism, subscribe today.

Better junction design needed if Limerick is serious about shift away from cars, says campaigners

— New project includes road widening, but mixing walking and cycling at junctions.

Limerick City and County County has citied the NTA’s National Cycle Manual to absolve itself after multiple public consultation submissions highlighted what is claimed to be poor design in a road redesign project junctions near the University of Limerick.

Campaigners have hit back at the public consultation report, saying if the city is serious about achieving modal shift to sustainable and active transport then it needs to offer active modes coherent flow through junctions, rather than the shared footpath design planned.

The project includes road widening and signalising the junctions of Plassey Road and Plassey Park Road, and Plassey Park Road and University Road.

While the design includes a shared footpath, the redesign also includes increasing the number of lanes on Plassey Park Road from three to five and Plassey Road from two to three.

The council’s consultation report claimed the reason for shared space between walking and cycling on the junctions is partly to protect people cycling against collisions with left turning motorists, but other corners of the junctions are left with the left turning conflict.

National Transport Authority officials have previously said that the National Cycle Manual is not supposed to be used to brush off criticisms of individual designs, but councils continue to use it in this way. A review of the manual is underway.

Despite the road widening, sections of the planned cycle tracks are just 1.5 metres wide, which is sub-standard according to the National Cycle Manual and even further below best practice. In is explained by the council by stating in its report that wider cycle tracks are provided “where practicable” and the the narrow widths were due to the “confines of the existing geometry and constrains of the built environment”.

Limerick Cycling Campaign said: “This design by Limerick Council is ‘proposed to proceed’ despite a number of concerns raised during consultation. Forcing pedestrians and cyclists together at junctions like this creates conflict and reduces the attractiveness of both modes of sustainable transport.”

“This is Plassey Road [graphic above with overlay by the campaign] — it is a key junction for access to University of Limerick and the technology park. If we are serious about achieving modal shift to sustainable and active transport we need to offer coherent flow through junctions,” the group said.

The Limerick Cycling Campaign added: “The only carriageway that is uninterrupted is that of the private car. Bus and cycle lanes play second fiddle to the movement of cars. Non continuous bus lanes are significantly less effective than continuous ones.” is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

September subscription drive update: has reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October), but this is unlikely and so the new target is the end of the year.

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.