is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Don’t brush this off as just another public consultation

— Where there’s space, there’s no need for cycle paths to be kept to minimal widths.

COMMENT & ANALYSIS: The deadline for submitting your comments on the Beach Road section of the Strand Road Cycle trial is today (Friday) — don’t brush it off as just another public consultation.

It might be easy to think of it was just another public consultation, but remember opposition to the full route is strong and they will be using the opportunity. It’s also an opportunity to ask the council to design the route right.

Here’s an overview map of what’s planned:

  • Blue = Beach Road (subject to this consultation)
  • Red = link to GAA club (also subject to this consultation)
  • Purple = Strand Road
  • Yellow = Merrion Rd / Rock Rd link to Blackrock Park

Beach Road and Strand Road is planned to be made one-way to make space for a two-way cycle path:

As an aside, Dublin City Council is very close to linking this route into the Grand Canal Route and onto different parts of the city centre.

This could be done by making Church Ave one-way and adding a two-way cycle path, filtering through traffic from Bath Ave and Londonbridge Road (with the bridge being for bicycles and emergency services access only), and putting cycle path/s on Grand Canal Street. The Grand Canal Street route could even continue into the city centre.

This is easier said than done but for the Strand Road route to excel it needs a connection to the city centre and a wider network.

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

This will bring some people to say Strand Road is the wrong route but there’s only 0.5km in the diffrence between the two routes — 3.7km vs 3.24km as shown below.

And, if the cycle route is designed well, a 0.5km detour is nothing. The advantages of a decent segregated quick-build route outways the detour.

One of the main positive changes under this public consultation is the redesign of this massive junction:

Here’s the plan for the junction — there needs to be wider cycle paths and better cycling link to the streets at the bottom of the drawing:

To highlight the issue of cycle paths to be kept to minimal widths — all of the area we have marked here in highlighter will be dead space — there’s no reason why the cycle paths here are not at least 4 metres wide or more:

The Greater Dublin Area Cycle Network Plan outlines widths of cycle paths to allow for the “conditions for social cycling and
passing”. There’s little evidence that social cycling and passing has been considered on the Strand Road project.

The theme of narrow cycle paths is continued along Beach Road:


Note this cross-section below is at the narrowest section of Beach Road, shown above with A A and arrows.

Note the bicycle being cycled with the guy in the green jumper is is the exact same location, but blue car is right beside the bollard protecting the cycle lane with nearly a car space left between the car and the kerb.

Because the space for cars is left extra wide, cycling between the cycle path and the side roads will be made all more harder — the left hand side road is a school.

On the next section note again the cross-section (if shown accurately) is at the narrowest point in this section:

The last cross section isn’t taken from the narrowest point in the section, but there’s even wider points — yet the cycle path is still left narrow:

This width is not continuous but where there is extra width it would be better use for the cycle path and buffer and bicycle turning area.

If it’s what the council officials want, there’s even space here to fomilase the in formal parking and still give more space to cycling. There’s no reason for the space to be able to fit three cars and a bit extra:

Even where it is not possable everywhere, 4 metres should be the minimum aim for the cycle path. The extra space matters to make the cycle route usable, enjoyable and safe. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

1 comment

  1. I reckon it’s well written and researched as opposed to being just another pro status quo, unthinking diatribe, othering people because they don’t buy into the heavily funded notion that your personal worth is tied up in how much of your income you are prepared to “invest” or waste on a depreciating “Asset” which actively damages children’s health, public spaces and the Environment.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.