is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Brown Thomas Arnotts, “holding up progress in Dublin for years”, promises to cut emissions

High-end retailer Brown Thomas Arnotts, which has a long history of objecting to pedestrianisation, cycle paths and bus priority measures, said that it “…always put sustainability at the heart of everything we do…”.

Brown Thomas Arnotts is the company name for a more formal joining up of the two department stores. Both stores for some time have been owned by companies controlled by the Weston family.

The retailers combined have directly or in-directly objected a large number of sustainable transport projects, including the College Green Plaza, the Liffey Street pedestrianisation, different versions of the Liffey Cycle Route, COVID mobility measures, the College Green Bus Gate, the City Centre Transport Study, and the South William Street pedestrianisation, which has been watered down to only a few metres.

Often the objection to projects has come in-directly via groups like the Dublin City Centre Traders Alliance which represented the company.

The Weston family also owns high-end retailers in other cities such as De Bijenkorf, which is associated with slowing progressing on reducing car access in the very centre of Amsterdam, and Holt Renfrew in Canada which is represented by the Bloor-Yorkville BIA business group which has objected to a cycle path outside the store.

According to The Irish Times, Brown Thomas Arnotts managing director Donald McDonald said the company is committed to imagining and creating a sustainable future for its people, customers, community and the planet. The company is promising to cut its emissions by 50% by 2030.

The Irish Times quoted McDonald: “As a business in existence for more than 175 years we have always put sustainability at the heart of everything we do…”

He added that the company’s aim is to “cultivate a retail environment that is conscious, considerate and community centred, while all the time protecting our planet”.

However, the news promoted the Dublin Commuter Coalition to say the company is “holding up progress in Dublin for years”.

Dublin Commuter Coalition said: “Brown Thomas Arnotts commits to a 50% cut in emissions by 2030. BT and Arnotts have continually opposed sustainable transport measures which negatively impact multi-storey car parks in Dublin city. They have been holding up progress in Dublin for years.”

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

They added: “Either they or the Dublin City Centre Traders Alliance (a car parking business conglomerate which claims to represent them) have opposed to: College Green Plaza, Liffey Street pedestrianisation, Interim Liffey Cycle Route, COVID mobility measures to name but a few.”

The news was also met with scepticism by others, including Graeme McQueen, who was until recently the head of communication for a Dublin business group.

He said: “As great as it is to see Brown Thomas and Arnotts talking about decarbonising, worth noting that they remain two of the biggest opponents to pedestrianisation and reduced car use in Dublin. The two simply don’t square.”

“These are lovely words from Brown Thomas Arnotts’ CEO. However, they seem pretty hollow when you consider their strong opposition to projects such as the pedestrianisation of Liffey St, College Green, area around Grafton St etc. A sign of more progressive attitudes? Let’s hope so.” is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

1 comment

  1. Do I detect a note of skepticism? But they are discontinuing beauty products containing glitter from next month so clearly this is no exercise in cynical greenwashing.

    No doubt certain BT customers, much like certain Sandymount residents, of which two groups there may well be an overlap, may like to congratulate themselves on their green credentials when it comes to the purchase of glitter-containing beauty products, choice of hybrid SUV’s or the renewable energy credentials of their favourite high-end shopping emporium, so long as it gives them a warm glow and ultimately there is absolutely no discernible inconvenience to their lifestyle choices.

    It is a real shame that many of the wealthiest in society are happy to maintain a pretense of eco-respectability, but through their rigid commitment to their own self-interest continue to be among the single biggest impediments to progress when it matters.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.