is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Walking and cycling funding allocations for towns and rural areas increased to €72.8m

Walking and cycling funding allocations for towns, villages and rural areas increased to €72.8 million compared to and expected €50 million.

The full list can be found here (PDF).

Much of the funding includes footpath renewal and crossings, and forward planning for networks of cycle routes in town and rural areas.

There are some cycling route projects listed but at this stage it’s unclear of what quality these will be. Concern is continuing among campaigners that large volumes of funding is being released without proper quality control or even updated interim guidance. The NTA recently rejected an FOI request on the details of projects in cities which were funded separately.

The funding is being allocated by Minister for Transport Eamon Ryan via the National Transport Authority and is part of the Green Party promise for nearly €1 million per day to be spent on walking and cycling for the lifetime of the coalition Government. The city and Greater Dublin Area was previously announced.

The €72.8m will be spit between 340 projects across 19 local authorities. It as being billed by the Government as “the first ever major active travel investment programme for rural Ireland”.

The fund will be administered for the Department of Transport by the National Transport Authority.

The funding includes to counties: Carlow, Laois, Longford, Louth, Kilkenny, Offaly, Westmeath, Wexford, Clare, Kerry, Tipperary, Galway, Leitrim, Mayo, Roscommon, Sligo, Cavan, Donegal, and Monaghan.

Minister Ryan said: “Today’s allocation marks another significant step forward in providing green sustainable transport options to those outside of the large urban centres.

“Developing high quality walking and cycling facilities will encourage more people to switch to active travel and will contribute to tackling climate change. Connecting communities and making walking and cycling attractive, safe and accessible to everyone is what this funding will help to accomplish,” he said.

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

He added: “The projects being funded today will make a real difference to rural communities across the country and this is only the beginning. I look forward to seeing these projects progress over the coming year and to developing high-quality walking and cycling networks over the course of this government.”

Minister of State Hildegarde Naughton said: “Today’s funding has a particular focus on rural Ireland; underpinned by Government’s commitment to spend almost €1m per day on walking and cycling projects, this funding will support the roll out of high-quality active travel infrastructure in rural towns and villages right across the country. I am particularly pleased to see specific projects receiving funding as part of the Safe Routes to School programme which we launched earlier this month. This safe and accessible infrastructure will ensure that our local communities are better connected, and that healthier forms of travel continue to become a more attractive choice.”

Anne Graham CEO of the NTA — who claimed recently that cycle route guidance was safe to the shock of TDs and campaigners — said: “Today’s allocation provides more funding to rural areas than ever before for active travel. The sum today is larger than the entire walking and cycling budget for 2019, which shows a clear need for this type of infrastructure across the country.

She added: “It also represents a very significant opportunity for our partner local authorities to develop high-quality, safe walking and cycling infrastructure in rural towns and villages. As with our announcement on the 11th of February much of the funding announced today represents new projects for authorities. We look forward to working with them through the next stages of development of these key projects .” is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

1 comment

  1. I gather from this article that funds are being distributed to counties throughout the state with little or no guidance on spending.
    This will result in a haphazard allotting of money, high, best practice quality in one place, a ‘sure that’ll do’ approach in others, and everything in between.
    Thus we’ll have no uniformity and a complete unfamiliarity for those who find themselves in different parts of the country.
    Surely this project needs a centralised approach and expert advice from our neighbours in northern Europe.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.