New €80 parking fines will allow ramp up in enforcement, says Dublin City Council

— Council looking to have parking enforcement patrols on foot or bicycles.

Dublin City Council plans to “significantly increase the number of fines which are being issued” to motorists illegally parking in the city. The move is part of ramping up enforcement in a 12-month pilot scheme of using fines alongside clamping.

Dublin City Council was the only council in Ireland to focus entirely on clamping, while most councils retained in-house traffic wardens, even if there is a shared criticism from the public that enforcement rarely extends beyond town or city centres.

Hello... sorry to interrupt you: IrishCycle.com is reader-funded journalism supported by just over 250 readers like you -- they have subscribed for €5 per month or more. If you can, please join them and subscribe today. If you have already subscribed -- thank you! Now, back to the article...

A report on the first 8 months of the trial by Dublin City Council’s parking enforcement division outlines how the increase in parking fines this month, from €40 to €80, will allow for an increased level of enforcement using fines, which are called Fixed Penalty Notices (FPN).

According to the report, issuing fines rather than using clamps avoids footpaths, cycle lanes and loading bays from being blocked while the clamp is in place. While fines are also more effective outside businesses where delivery drivers, shop owners or customers “can quickly return to their vehicle” before a clamp can be attached. Clamps also cannot be attached to coaches as it is a safety risk to try to attach a clamp as drivers often wait with their coaches.

The council said that during the pilot period to date there were “limited resources” and parking enforcers “predominantly focused on footpath and clearway offences”. Parking a vehicle on a footpath accounted for 506 fines or 44.8% of the 1,129 fines issued as part of the trial.

Only 13 or 1.2% were for parking on mandatory cycle tracks, the legal name cycle lanes and segregated cycle paths marked with a solid white line. However, the fine for parking or even stopping a vehicle on clearway accounted for 244 or 21.6% of the fines, and most cycle lanes on main streets in the city include clearways.

It is understood that parking in a clearway is also the preferred reason to clamp motorists with as it is seen as simpler than cycle lanes, which can often vary from solid lines or not, or sometimes not have the correct signage.

The report outlines how Dublin Street Parking Services (DSPS), the private company that has a contract with the council to implement parking enforcement, is continuing to clamp, relocate, and remove vehicles illegally parked by motorists.

The trial started in June 2021 and, to date, the council has taken in €37,000 in fines against a cost of approximately €35,000 to implement the system.

81% of fines issued have been paid while just over 50 cases were forwarded to the council’s legal department for a Court summons to be issued. Only 55 or 6% of fines were appealed and only 6 of the appeals were upheld.

The council wants to see the contract with DSPS amended to include more targeted enforcement with mobile patrol methods, such as patrols on foot or bicycle, in the city centre rather than just in vans.

The fines issued as part of the trial included six offences originally: Parking on a footpath (footway), parking in a clearway, parking in a mandatory cycle track (solid white line), parking in a bus lane during the period of operation, unauthorised parking in a loading bay, and parking in an area designated for buses or coaches. These apply to all types of motorists.

The report outlined how “code blacks”, where clamps are cut illegally, has become a large issue around construction sites.

The report said “In October 2021, a further seventeen offences were added in an effort to address areas of concern, particularly around construction sites. From October FPN’s could be issued for the
offences below to illegally parked ‘commercial’ vehicles in the vicinity of or associated areas within construction site. This was introduced to help address problematic areas and also to help reduce the high number of code blacks currently being experienced particularly around construction sites.”

These 17 offences included parking at a bus stop, parking within 5 meters of a junction, not paying at a parking bay, and exceeding the maximum allowed stay allowed in a parking bay. Enforcement of the 17 extra offences are restricted so-far to commercial vehicles, but parking services are seeking this to be extended to all types of vehicles.

The report said: “Due to the limited scope of the scheme, DSPS report they are unable to maximise the effectiveness in areas of large non-compliance and areas of contention, which often require Gardai attendance when traditional enforcement is applied. The FPN would be more efficient in these cases and can be issued with less confrontation and interaction with the drivers.”

The parking enforcement section of the council is recommending engaging with DSPS to extend the pilot beyond June 2022.

Lord Mayor of Dublin City, Cllr Alison Gilliland (Labour) said: “Parking on the footpath disproportionately affects people with mobility issues, such as wheelchair users or those who are visually challenged as well as people with buggies.”

She added: “For them, it is not easy to step onto the road to get past a car blocking their way. It’s hugely important for us to keep our footpaths clear so that everyone can access the city freely.”

Cllr Michael Pidgeon (Green Party) said: “This looks like a big success to me. There’s a high rate of payment, a low rate of successful appeals, and it’s been rightly focused on clearing paths, bus lanes and bike lanes.”

He said clamping works well for motorists that haven’t paid their parking charge in a legal parking space, but is often impractical against drivers parked elsewhere who can move before a clamp is applied and he said even when it is applied “it means that the blockage is stuck in place for hours”.

“That’s going to mean hundreds of pedestrians inconvenienced, people with disabilities undermined, and cyclists forced to veer out into traffic,” he said.

Cllr Pidgeon said: “Rolling out a new pilot scheme can be expensive. It’s really heartening to see that even this pilot turned a profit. With fines now doubled and a stronger rollout, we can only expect this to improve. The best thing to do now is to ramp up the pilot for the next few months, widen its aim, and see how best to roll out for the long-term.”

He added: “The Greens will be pushing for a return to parking or community wardens, much as we see in other parts of Ireland or around the world. And for those who are opposed, all I’ll say is that this charge is easy to avoid: just don’t break the law and park where you should.”

Hello Reader... IrishCycle.com is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for IrishCycle.com, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give IrishCycle.com's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year IrishCycle.com had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of February, 210 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.3% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via ko-fi.com/irishcycle/tiers

Cian Ginty
Editor, IrishCycle.com

5 comments

  1. There are plenty of videos of illegally parked cars being removed and taken to a pound where they can be retrieved for a fee . It’s been done this way in many developed nations for decades. Why are we still using antiquated method that are not best practice?

    Reply
    • While that tow truck is driving from the city centre to a pound on the edge of the city, and the whole way back, no enforcement is happening. That’s a lot of wasted time if you just focus on towing to a pound.

      Cities I know have a mix of methods, but fine are usually the main parking enforcement method.

      Reply
      • Ok, so just stick tickets on vehicles and hope the fine are paid.

        This inconvenientes the owner of the illegally parked vehicle. But while the vehicle is in situ it inconveniences a multitude of people; people using wheelchairs, parents with children, buses, bicycle users …

        Towing the vehicle, primarily inconvenvience the culprit.

        This method of punishing offenders is implemented in cities far bigger than Dublin in Japan, Germany, …and many other countries. Fleets of trucks pick up vehicles, each time in a matter of minutes. They unload the vehicle and immediately return to work. They work 24/7 and the system works. Those who can afford the odd ticket are also inconvenienced.

        To emphasise the point; I had a boss in London who, when visiting the office building, would park his Roll Royce illegally in front of the building and treat the occasional fine as a parking fee for parking in central London.

        He would not do that these days for fear of having his car towed.

        Reply
  2. Fines are a joke if you have plenty of money. No surprises its most often the more expensive cars that park on footpaths. Anyway the question we should be asking is why Gardai never book anyone for crazy dangerous parking in areas too far out into the suburbs for the clampers to be passing. I could list off about twenty locations.

    Reply
  3. Paltry fine of €80 is no deterent to the wealthy or those who can write it off as a business expense. Tow-away is far better with a hefty reclaim fee from the pound, but it needs a fleet of private tow-trucks scattered all across the city with local licensed operators of them paid a bounty for the service. It should not be vested in DSPS.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.