No paywall and let's keep it that way. Support reader-funded journalism, subscribe today.

RSA questioned on spending nearly €1m per year on high-vis without research backing

— TD asks why there isn’t education programmes around the dangers of SUVs.

A TD has challenged the Road Safety Authority for spending a “huge amount of money” and focusing on high-vis with “very little research around it” and because it is victim-blaming.

The RSA spends around €800,000 per year on buying high-vis and this was challenged at the Oireachtas Committee on Transport last week.

TD for Dublin Central, Neasa Hourigan (Green Party) said: “Let me be explicit about the point I am making. In the Design Manual for Urban Roads and Streets there is a principle set out on the hierarchy of the street, which is that vulnerable pedestrians are first, then pedestrians in general, then people such as cyclists and then we get to motorised vehicles. If we look at the operation of how we are running the country, we are placing the onus and responsibility for safety on small children whom we are asking to wear high-vis material. Is this a fair reflection of what is happening?”

She questioned the RSA having school-based campaigns around high-vis, such as its “Hi-Glo Silver” campaign, but not having similar ones for SUV drivers given the extra dangers around SUVs.

“We are going into their places of education and asking them to draw pictures and posters stating if they wear high-vis material, they will not be knocked down by an SUV. There is no parity of esteem on a street for a six-year-old faced with an SUV. Is this fair?” she said.

Deputy Hourigan added: “We are spending €800,000 on high-vis material. Would it be better to spend this almost €1 million on educating drivers who are propelling large dangerous vehicles around our roads?”

Committee chairperson, Limerick City TD, Kieran O’Donnell (Fine Gael) said: “I do not want this to be adversarial. Deputy Hourigan has made a valid point. We are all trying to make the roads safer. Providing high-vis material to school children is very welcome. Is there also a need to extend the programme to include all aspects of this?”

Deputy Hourigan said: “With respect, the point is that we are victim blaming small children. To be honest, research on high-vis material and cycling is poor. Research on high-vis material and pedestrians is almost non-existent. We spend huge amounts of money with very little research behind it. The question is whether we should be spending this money on educating drivers and putting money into making our streets safer.”

Sam Waide, CEO of the RSA, said: “The answer is ‘Yes’. In the road safety strategy, there is a specific action on safe road use and safe travel to work. This will be a programme with employers. It will not only encourage safer driving. One of our delivery partners is the HSE. One area is van drivers wearing high-vis vests. This is something they already do as some employers provide high-vis vests for their van drivers. If there is a recommendation in the road safety strategy, we will implement it if it helps and encourages safer road use.”

Deputy O’Donnell said: “I am a former councillor and have been a public representative for many years. We deal with this issue on a daily basis. People in residential areas approach me to say they want speed limits reduced. I go back to the council and interact with it. I have been dealing with this for years and I understand it. The question is: what will work?”

He added: “I always look at things in the round. I would like my child to wear a high-visibility jacket because it is better than not wearing one. I take the point about education certainly around users of cars and vehicles. What model actually works, is practical and gets us to the same endpoint? I would like Mr. Rowland to do housekeeping on this. Is the working group the RSA recommended in the strategy up and running at this stage?”

Michael Rowland, director of road safety research and driver education at the RSA, said: “In regard to hi-vis, our preference would be that we would not have to distribute hi-vis. That will happen once we reduce speed limits and we have safer streets. In the meantime, we are left with no choice but to ensure that our children are safe on the roads and that is the reason we distribute hi-vis jackets.”

Joan Swift, a spokesperson for Love 30, a campaign group for lower speed limits, said: “Some of the UK local police forces are quite vocal on social media making the point that, unless people are looking, they will not see someone. They show photographs of a police car with high-vis or, as we have seen all too often here, railway bridges plastered with high-vis material and nonetheless people drive into them.”

She added: “I support Deputy Hourigan in the sense it is not that we do not want our children to be safe and to be seen but is the onus on the child? We do not know whether high-vis materials make a difference or whether there are other measures that might make a bigger difference.” is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

September subscription drive update: has reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October), but this is unlikely and so the new target is the end of the year.

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. That Deputy Hourigan feels the need to raise the topic of pedestrians and bicycle users wearing high visibility clothing, is indicative of the frustration experienced by vulnerable road users.

    It is blatantly obvious that if we implemented the Netherlands policy of ‘Sustainable Safety’ on roads we would not be having this discussion.

    I suggest all TDs take the time watch the following video on YouTube;

    The clear evidence suggests that the Dutch sustainable safety ethos and their vast and lengthy experience of managing roads under the ethos, works.

    We do not need to make the mistakes of other nations.

    There are clear, well organised models for us to observe and emulate.

    Do we have the political courage and will to construct Dutch style infrastructure?

  2. The RSA has become a retailer of unwanted clothing accessories. This insistence makes them irrelevant and an actual impediment to the adoption of measures that would save lives. If they can’t evolve they need to go.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.