is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

An alternative to barriers on cycle routes?

As reported in February, Irish authorities have been directed to stop using restrictive barriers on walking and cycling routes. But are Dutch “drempels” — a type of inverted speed ramp — a solution?

The text on used on the sign approaching srempels reads: “Drempel — (brom)fietsers, Matig uw snelheid!”, which translates to “Threshold (moped)cyclists, moderate your speed!”

Drempels laren’t discomfortable to cycle across at average cycling speeds.

The design is used mainly to slow mopeds. As an aside: Mopeds restricted to 25km/h are generally allowed on Dutch cycle paths, but speed restrictors are often tampered with. Because of their speed and mass, mopeds are seen as problematic and have been banned recently from cycle paths in central areas in Amsterdam and Utrecht.

The town of Houten is designed in a way where the road network for cars is much more circuitous than the routes for walking and cycling. So, it’s seen as an unlikely proposition to ban mopeds. So, there are far more drempels than you’ll see in most other places.

Cycling over them on bicycles is not that discomfortable.

Would drempels be a good idea instead of restrictive barriers such as kissing gates and chicane gates?

Here’s a few images of drempels, which are made out of larger pre-formed / pre-casted tiles: is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.