is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Video footage shows a coach passing within inches of bicycle but Gardai see no issue

Despite having video footage showing a coach passing within inches of a bicycle on Dublin’s quays last year, the investing Garda wrote that “I am unable to determine if an offence has been committed”.

Under Irish law, it is illegal for motorists to overtake or attempt to overtake bicycles “if to do so would endanger or cause inconvenience to a pedal cyclist”. The offence carries 3 points and the fixed charge fine is €120, but many who report incidents say that Gardai are relucent enforce the law, with some not being fully aware of the law and others overruled by senior officers.

READ MORE: Explainer: What is the law on overtaking cyclists in Ireland?

A reader who posted the letter from the Garda and video of the incident said that he has experienced a recurring issue where Garda officers appear to be understanding of the dangers but that more senior officers instruct no action to be taken despite video evidence of a close pass.

This is in line with the findings of the survey on the Gardai response to members of the public reporting motorists who have close passed them.

Speaking to, Dan Dunne said: “When speaking to Gardaí in a station, they appear to be quite understanding of the danger cyclists face, however, when decisions get moved up to a Sergeant there doesn’t seem to be any action taken.”

“At most, there is a phone call or house call made, so the driver is ‘made aware of other road users’. The only solution to this is an online portal, with Gardaí properly trained on reading the submitted footage, so that there are real-world consequences for dangerous drivers,” said Dunne .

In a letter to Dunne, the investigating Garda said: “I am investigating the traffic matter that was reported on 09/06/2021. After requesting and viewing the GoPro footage, I am unable to determine if an offence has been committed. I have contacted the bus company and they have cautioned their drivers to drive with caution, especially in relation to cyclists. I will be recommend this incident to be closed. Any questions please contact me…”

WARNING: Audio not safe for work or home:

Originally tweeted by Dan (@danmandunne) on June 14, 2022.

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. I give up with AGS! This example is yet another in a long line that convinces me that members and officers are clueless about cycling safety.

  2. I think the legislation is weak here. How do you prove endangering or causing inconvenience? Those conditions only become evident of there is some later impact, like having to stop and gather yourself, and be witnessed. The adrenaline from a close encounter keeps you going; the impact is usually delayed.

    This is why it’s better to have a specific close pass distance. If that law was in place, there would be a basis for a charge against the driver in this case.

    I have some sympathy for the Guards, they have to do their best with the tools available.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.