is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Better passenger and community access needed for Dart+ West, says transport and disability groups

— No lifts at most new Dart stations on Maynooth line; gradient of ramps is at higher level for cycling.

Irish Rail has submitted an application for a railway order for the upgrade of the Maynooth line, but transport and accessibility groups have criticised the lack of lifts and the design of ramps at stations where level crossings will be closed.

The closing of level crossings has been a long-term goal for Irish Rail and it is required to enable electric Dart trains to operate on the route at high-frequencies. The closure of level crossings is separately planned on the existing Dart route to allow for higher frequencies too.

Some groups which object to the full project and/or object to directing motorists onto fewer overpasses are using ugliness of the planned walking and cycling overpasses as a key argument, but the design for passenger and community access is also an issue for groups who support the Dart+ project.

Feljin Jose, chairperson of the Dublin Commuter Coalition, said: “It’s completely unacceptable that Irish Rail would refuse to build lifts at stations as part of this €1bn project. The ramps are impractical for the elderly and people with reduced mobility and create a detour for all users.”

Speaking to, he added: “Irish Rail received overwhelmingly negative feedback about the new Pelletstown station last year so it’s even more bizarre that they are pushing ahead with this inaccessible design.”

A disability group, Access for All also said that the design “will disable people and not enable them.”

Access for All said: “Lifts should be a given for not only our disabled community but for our elderly and others who cannot manage long long walking distances or flights of steps.”

The group said: “These are shots of the ramps being suggested as replacements for lift access at the proposed Porterstown and Clonsilla dart stations which is currently out to public consultation. They are immense structures that will disable people and not enable them.”

The full details of the railway order application can be found at

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.


The drawings show an insufficient width for cycling with the cycling space marked out as 2.9 metres wide for two-way cycle right beside a high wall:

Especially along a hairpin bend and at gradients of 5%:

Ashtown will also have an underpass north of the station but this does not follow best practice by mixing walking and cycling on a shared path, by lowering walking and cycling to the same level as needed for buses and trucks, and having no solid segregation between the shared path and the roadway:


Gradients and widths the same as above:

Porterstown Road

Surface is just shared:

New walking and cycling overpass at Clonsilla Road

New road bridge at R121

With shared space leaving to/from the cycle paths: is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

1 comment

  1. These designs are as ugly as they are impractical. This is an opportunity to define a coherent look for a selection of our country’s rail stations beside one of our most beautiful amenities that is the Royal Canal. It’s understandable that the industrial style may be cheaper to construct and maintain but surely we should be aiming higher than that. Some facade improvements to the Pelletstown station would go a long way as well.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.