No paywall and let's keep it that way. Support reader-funded journalism, subscribe today.

How should the space on Dublin’s quays be used? Part two

We’re continuing to ask: What should Dublin’s quays look like? Following on from Arran Quay last week, this is Wolfe Tone Quay: first the current view from Google Street View and then images showing possible use of space:Wolfe Tone Quay current S


The above image is close to the current layout of Wolfe Tone Quay — there’s a bus lane with a tiny cycle lane inside it, there’s two traffic lanes heading towards the city which quickly merge into one lane, and there’s an amazing 390m lane for turning right over the bridge ahead.Wolfe Tone Quay possable with two lanes S


Above is our first reimagining of how the space could be used. In short: Footpath | bus lane | general motorised traffic lane | smaller green space for trees or bushes | two-way cycle track | grass | enlarged riverside walkway built around current tree alignment.

The bus lane would be for city-bound buses but the traffic lane would only allow traffic to turn left or right ahead. City-bound general traffic would use the south quays.

The current left-hand footpath would remain the same. The bus lane would be made smaller with the removal of the cycle lane. One traffic lane would remain but only for traffic heading into  Blackhall Place (access to Smithfield, Stoneybatter, Grangegorman, Bolton Street etc), or traffic crossing the bridge to get to Thomas Street.

Next the shown smaller green space could be used for bushes or trees to act as a buffer between the cycle route and the motorised traffic. The cycle route would be two-way. The next bit of green would be grass making up a kind of linear park and the quay-side footpath would also be widened.Wolfe Tone Quay possable with one lane S

Above, with our second reimagining of the space, city-bound buses would use the south quays leaving just one motorised traffic lane for city-bound general traffic.

It’s the same as the above expect for the extra space from the removal of the bus lane is given over to extra green space. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

September subscription drive update: has reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October), but this is unlikely and so the new target is the end of the year.

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. Good to see re imagining of Dublin streets, but why do we need all these narrow, essentially useless strips of grass ? Dutch segregate cars, trams and bikes very successfully using kerbs etc. Insistence on grass strips takes us a non trivial amount of road scape. Having said that, please jddptp the good work

    • Sorry your comment got stuck in moderation until now.

      The suggested greenery (bushes or trees) in the smaller strip is in keeping with what the Dutch often do, and the larger strip of grass intended as a kind of extension of the linear park along the river further west, or at least a visual extension of the parkland between the quay and the Luas. The project can’t be just about cycling, but making the quays more attractive.

      And, of course, I’m suggesting grass here, but further up the quays nearer the city core I’ll suggest far larger footpaths – space for seating etc.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.