is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

An education problem or a design in need of fixing?

The Dublin Cycling Campaign posted a video on its Facebook page of the Merrion Road junction with Nutely Lane and how cyclists traveling straight on stay in the left turning lane. But is this really an education problem?

This image below from Google Street View shows the T-junction the videos shows, the cyclist traveling straight in the left turning lane, rather than ‘correctly’ cycling in the lane when the bus is:

The Dublin Cycling Campaign seem to see this as an education problem, but our view is that it’s a design problem. UK-style cycle training is just a survival guide until our roads are fixed.

We could go the full hog and say the road should have cycle lanes or tracks (and such would fit on the road without taking away much or anything from other users, at least a few 100m past the junction).

But forgetting going the full hog for a second: Like in many places in Dublin, there’s simply no reason for the shared bus (and cycle / taxi) lane to end before the T-junction, expect maybe to allow a few motorists to skip ahead. Before the junction on both sides there’s only a single lane for general traffic and a singe bus lane — there’s no reason the bus lane needs to end before the junction.

Mapped below the highlighted blue sections show the current bus lanes, while the orange is the gap where the bus lane is missing:


Filling in the gap in the bus lane would be a quick fix.

There are more radical changes which could be done. But realistically if we’re even half serious about cycling most of the section — at least from just north of the Nutley Lane junction as far as the hospital junction with the Merrion Road —  should have 1.75m wide cycle lanes as a minimum and slightly wider again if the cycle lane is on the outside a left turning lane.

Are we even half serious?

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. Of course the reason why most Cyclists do not go to the right most of the time coming to this junction is because they cannot because of the Traffic flying by them. If you are lucky enough to be able to judge it in time or the Traffic is slight then you can move over to the straight ahead lane.
    It is worse if you are a stranger to the area and dont know the layout of the junction and cannot cross over in time on your Bicycle. Of course like you say continuing the Bus Lane through the Junction would help solve this.No thought given to the safety of Cyclists like at most junctions such as Westmoreland St or Dame St junction with Sth Georges St or other areas,just three or even four lane junctions that you have to try and cross to the right with speeding Traffic.

  2. It is definitely a design problem and it is a legacy of a design approach which sought to maintain free-flowing conditions/maximise junction capacity for motor vehicles.

    There is really no need for the left turning lane at all. Removing it would only have a minor impact on the capacity of the junction (if that was your primary concern).


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.