October 6, 2014
We usually avoid using Google Maps for images, but in this case the example is worth capturing.
If this junction in Swords was not designed as pictured, how on earth did was it allowed to develop into that monster that is above? If you look at the four corners of the junction on Street View you’ll see that all four corners are a poor translation of Dutch junction design, the one above clearly being the most messed up.
There’s so much going on, it’s worth listing all that’s wrong with it:
- The footpaths and cycle paths are too narrow
- Cycle path users are told to yield to a drive way (top right hand corner)
- The kerb line is not flush between the roadway and the paths — making it harder or at least less comfortable for bicycles, prams and wheelchairs
- Rather than having the paths set back from the roadway for polls and posts, these are placed on the cycle path
- Added to the above , somebody thought it was worth painting lines around these polls and leaving less than 0.5 gaps and went to the trouble of making a distinction between solid white lines and broken white lines
- For example, according to a reading of the markings, somebody on a bicycle coming onto that path from crossing point at the left of the image, should stay between the two lines (beside the red tactical paving slabs) and make another sharp turn, following the yellow line here, watching your handlebars near the polls
It’s messed up on so many levels.
Irish councils and transport bodies seems to have given up on this type of design — they seem to have compromised by opting for a shared use surface at junctions. But why can’t we get the Dutch design right? Here’s some examples how this kind of thing should be done, as its done in the Netherlands:
Image: Google Maps
Location: Cross road of Forest Rd and Rathingle Rd in Swords
Local body/authority: Fingal County Council
Street View: Currently shows as pictured
Send suggestions to email@example.com. And make sure to view the original and UK-focused facility of the month page on Warrington Cycle Campaign’s website.
Subscription drive update: IrishCycle.com reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).
If you can help push IrishCycle.com above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!
Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.
IrishCycle.com is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.
There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for IrishCycle.com, it just needs enough people like you to believe!
Monthly subscriptions will give IrishCycle.com's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year IrishCycle.com had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.
I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.
The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!
But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via ko-fi.com/irishcycle/tiers