Bicycle parking shelter removed at Windy Arbour Luas due to anti-social behaviour

A spokesman the agency which looks after Dublin’s Luas tram system said that it was regrettable that a bicycle shelter at the Windy Arbour stop had to be removed due to anti-social behaviour. The bicycle racks are to remain in place, unsheltered.

The tram stop is at the western end of the Luas-UCD-Dart route.

Tom Manning, a spokesman for the Railway Procurement Agency, said: “The bike shelter at Windy Arbour was removed because it was being used as a focal point for young people to congregate and , in some cases, engage in anti-social behaviour. This resulted in numerous complaints from local residents. RPA concluded that, unfortunately, the only solution was to remove the shelter altogether.”

Hello... sorry to interrupt you: is reader-funded journalism supported by just over 250 readers like you -- they have subscribed for €5 per month or more. If you can, please join them and subscribe today. If you have already subscribed -- thank you! Now, back to the article...

He added: “It is regrettable that a facility that was installed in order to improve the local environment and provide a convenient location for cyclists to leave their bikes and travel on Luas, proved to be such a nuisance to neighbours. The bicycle racks themselves were left in place.”

Hello Reader... is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of February, 210 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.3% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. Shelter was effective and was used, but RPA removed it instead of removing anti social behaviour.? There was some anti social behaviour on the royal canal greenway so they tried to block it off to all but the most determined users. Cars kill vulnerable road users and they blame the victims for lack of hi is vests. I think I am seeing a pattern here of lack of competence from those charged with organising our travel infrastructure to the benifit of all users. Maybe it’s time for a mass sacking and removal of councilers and engineers due to their antisocial planning behaviour to herald in a new era of responsible, considered, intelligent infrastructure design and maintenance.

  2. Cyclists just don’t count.

    It begs question: Why did RPA not have to seek planning permission for this change in use?

    What this shows up is the failure of our society to deal with ASB. Any time there is an ASB problem cyclists take the punishment and not the perpetrators.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.